Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Statement Of Problem: Rapid osseointegration between implant and bone tissue for early loading of a prosthesis with sufficient primary stability depends on the surface characteristics of the implant. The development and characterization of suitable surface coatings on dental implants is a major challenge.
Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate and compare the osteogenic potential and cytotoxicity of unmodified zirconia, acid-etched zirconia, bioactive glass-coated zirconia, and tamarind kernel polysaccharide with hydrophilic acrylic acid (TKP-AA) hydrogel-coated zirconia.
Material And Methods: Thirty-six disks each of unmodified zirconia, acid-etched, 45S5 bioactive glass-coated, and TKP-AA hydrogel-coated zirconia were evaluated for osteogenic potential and cytotoxic effect by using human osteoblast Saos-2 cells. The surface topography of the disks and the morphology of the cells grown on these surfaces were examined by scanning electron microscopy (n=3). The cell attachment was evaluated by confocal imaging (n=3). The cytotoxic effect was evaluated by cell viability assay (n=9). Osteoblast maturation was assessed by alkaline phosphatase assay (n=9) and cell mineralization by alizarin red staining (n=9). ANOVA and Bonferroni multiple comparison post hoc tests were used to evaluate the statistical significance of the intergroup differences in these characteristics (α=.05).
Results: The surface modifications resulted in distinct changes in the surface morphology of zirconia disks and the growth of Saos-2 cells. Zirconia disks coated with TKP-AA promoted higher proliferation of osteoblasts compared with unmodified disks (P<.001). Similarly, the surface modifications significantly increased the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells to osteoblasts as compared with uncoated zirconia (P<.001). However, the rate of differentiation to osteoblasts was similar among the surface modifications. Acid-etched and TKP-AA-coated disks promoted mineralization of osteoblasts to the same extent, except bioactive glass coating, which significantly increased the rate of mineralization (P<.001).
Conclusions: Surface modification of zirconia by acid etching and coating with Bioglass or TKP-AA hydrogel resulted in the improved growth and differentiation of osteoblasts. TKP-AA hydrogel coating promoted the proliferation of osteoblasts, whereas Bioglass coating showed better mineralization. TKP-AA hydrogel coating is a promising candidate for improving the osseointegration of dental implants that warrants further investigation.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.04.014 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!