An open-label randomized controlled trial of the effect of lopinavir/ritonavir, lopinavir/ritonavir plus IFN-β-1a and hydroxychloroquine in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

Clin Microbiol Infect

Université de Paris, IAME, INSERM, F-75018 Paris, France; AP-HP, Hôpital Bichat, Département d'Épidémiologie, Biostatistique et Recherche Clinique, F-75018 Paris, France; AP-HP, Hôpital Bichat, Unité de Recherche Clinique, F-75018 Paris, France; CIC-EC 1425, INSERM, F-75018 Paris, France.

Published: December 2021

AI Article Synopsis

  • A phase III clinical trial, called DisCoVeRy, assessed the effectiveness and safety of treatments like lopinavir/ritonavir, hydroxychloroquine, and remdesivir in hospitalized COVID-19 patients needing oxygen or ventilation compared to standard care.
  • The study involved 583 participants, with no significant improvement in clinical status at day 15 for those taking investigational treatments, such as lopinavir/ritonavir or hydroxychloroquine, when compared to the control group.
  • Serious adverse events were notably higher in patients receiving lopinavir/ritonavir, raising safety concerns about its use in this patient population.

Article Abstract

Objectives: We evaluated the clinical, virological and safety outcomes of lopinavir/ritonavir, lopinavir/ritonavir-interferon (IFN)-β-1a, hydroxychloroquine or remdesivir in comparison to standard of care (control) in coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19) inpatients requiring oxygen and/or ventilatory support.

Methods: We conducted a phase III multicentre, open-label, randomized 1:1:1:1:1, adaptive, controlled trial (DisCoVeRy), an add-on to the Solidarity trial (NCT04315948, EudraCT2020-000936-23). The primary outcome was the clinical status at day 15, measured by the WHO seven-point ordinal scale. Secondary outcomes included quantification of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in respiratory specimens and pharmacokinetic and safety analyses. We report the results for the lopinavir/ritonavir-containing arms and for the hydroxychloroquine arm, trials of which were stopped prematurely.

Results: The intention-to-treat population included 583 participants-lopinavir/ritonavir (n = 145), lopinavir/ritonavir-IFN-β-1a (n = 145), hydroxychloroquine (n = 145), control (n = 148)-among whom 418 (71.7%) were male, the median age was 63 years (IQR 54-71), and 211 (36.2%) had a severe disease. The day-15 clinical status was not improved with the investigational treatments: lopinavir/ritonavir versus control, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.83, (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55-1.26, p 0.39), lopinavir/ritonavir-IFN-β-1a versus control, aOR 0.69 (95%CI 0.45-1.04, p 0.08), and hydroxychloroquine versus control, aOR 0.93 (95%CI 0.62-1.41, p 0.75). No significant effect of investigational treatment was observed on SARS-CoV-2 clearance. Trough plasma concentrations of lopinavir and ritonavir were higher than those expected, while those of hydroxychloroquine were those expected with the dosing regimen. The occurrence of serious adverse events was significantly higher in participants allocated to the lopinavir/ritonavir-containing arms.

Conclusion: In adults hospitalized for COVID-19, lopinavir/ritonavir, lopinavir/ritonavir-IFN-β-1a and hydroxychloroquine improved neither the clinical status at day 15 nor SARS-CoV-2 clearance in respiratory tract specimens.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8149166PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2021.05.020DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

clinical status
12
versus control
12
open-label randomized
8
controlled trial
8
ifn-β-1a hydroxychloroquine
8
status day
8
control aor
8
sars-cov-2 clearance
8
hydroxychloroquine
7
lopinavir/ritonavir
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!