AI Article Synopsis

  • The Ministry of Health in Tanzania introduced National Cancer Treatment Guidelines in February 2020 to enhance and standardize cancer care across the country, particularly at the Ocean Road Cancer Institute (ORCI).
  • In June 2019, focus group discussions involving 21 oncology clinicians revealed both internal and external factors impacting the delivery of guideline-based care, highlighting issues like infrastructure, communication, and public awareness.
  • The findings led to actionable strategies aimed at overcoming barriers and boosting the implementation of the TNCTG at ORCI, ultimately seeking to improve cancer treatment in Tanzania.

Article Abstract

Background: In response to the increasing burden of cancer in Tanzania, the Ministry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Elderly and Children launched National Cancer Treatment Guidelines (TNCTG) in February 2020. The guidelines aimed to improve and standardize oncology care in the country. At Ocean Road Cancer Institute (ORCI), we developed a theory-informed implementation strategy to promote guideline-concordant care. As part of the situation analysis for implementation strategy development, we conducted focus group discussions to evaluate clinical systems and contextual factors that influence guideline-based practice prior to the launch of the TNCTG.

Materials And Methods: In June 2019, three focus group discussions were conducted with a total of 21 oncology clinicians at ORCI, stratified by profession. A discussion guide was used to stimulate dialogue about facilitators and barriers to delivery of guideline-concordant care. Discussions were audio recorded, transcribed, translated, and analyzed using thematic framework analysis.

Results: Participants identified factors both within the inner context of ORCI clinical systems and outside of ORCI. Themes within the clinical systems included capacity and infrastructure, information technology, communication, efficiency, and quality of services provided. Contextual factors external to ORCI included interinstitutional coordination, oncology capacity in peripheral hospitals, public awareness and beliefs, and financial barriers. Participants provided pragmatic suggestions for strengthening cancer care delivery in Tanzania.

Conclusion: Our results highlight several barriers and facilitators within and outside of the clinical systems at ORCI that may affect uptake of the TNCTG. Our findings were used to inform a broader guideline implementation strategy, in an effort to improve uptake of the TNCTGs at ORCI.

Implications For Practice: This study provides an assessment of cancer care delivery systems in a low resource setting from the unique perspectives of local multidisciplinary oncology clinicians. Situational analysis of contextual factors that are likely to influence guideline implementation outcomes is the first step of developing an implementation strategy for cancer treatment guidelines. Many of the barriers identified in this study represent actionable targets that will inform the next phases of our implementation strategy for guideline-concordant cancer care in Tanzania and comparable settings.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8265360PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/onco.13834DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

implementation strategy
20
cancer care
16
clinical systems
16
oncology clinicians
12
care delivery
12
contextual factors
12
multidisciplinary oncology
8
cancer
8
strengthening cancer
8
delivery systems
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!