AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigated the pharmacokinetics and safety of two HIV prevention treatments, F/TDF and F/TAF, in uninfected women.
  • F/TAF showed significantly higher concentrations of the active drug in certain tissues, suggesting it might be a more effective option compared to F/TDF for protecting against HIV via rectal transmission.
  • Furthermore, F/TDF users reported more gastrointestinal adverse events, indicating that F/TAF may have a better safety profile.

Article Abstract

Background: Daily oral emtricitabine (FTC, F)/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) combination is approved for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in men and women. Tenofovir alafenamide fumarate (TAF) is a newer, more potent prodrug of tenofovir (TFV), and in combination with FTC, has recently been approved for prevention of HIV through rectal transmission.

Methods: This Phase I, prospective, interventional, randomized study was conducted in three clinical sites: PROFAMILIA, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic; University of Pittsburgh and Eastern Virginia Medical School. We assessed the multi-compartmental pharmacokinetics (primary outcome) and safety (secondary outcome) among HIV uninfected women randomized to F/TDF (200mg/300mg) or F/TAF (200mg/25mg; F/TAF25) (n=24) in a single dose phase (SDP) and F/TDF, F/TAF (200mg/10mg; F/TAF10), or F/TAF25 (n=75) in a multiple dose (14 daily doses) phase (MDP). We described PK parameters in plasma, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), and cervicovaginal (CV) and rectal fluids and tissues. ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT02904369, completed.

Findings: Recruitment for the study began on 5 October 2016. The first participant was enrolled on 6 October 2016 and the last participant completed the study 21 November 2017.

Plasma: TFV concentrations area under curve (AUC) were ~20 fold lower following F/TAF versus F/TDF. TFV-diphosphate (TFV-DP) AUC concentrations in PBMCs were 7-fold higher with F/TAF25 versus F/TDF. Median TFV-DP concentrations in vaginal tissue (4hours post last dose) were approximately 6-fold higher with F/TAF25 versus F/TDF. TFV and TFV-DP were lower with F/TAF versus F/TDF in rectal tissue. Concentrations of FTC and FTC-triphosphate (FTC-TP) were similar across matrices and treatment arms. Gastrointestinal adverse events (AEs) occurred more frequently in F/TDF users (44.0%) than in either F/TAF group (11.5 and 12.0%).

Interpretation: F/TAF was safe and well-tolerated. TFV-DP concentrations were higher in PBMCs and similar or higher (4h post dose) in female genital tract tissues for F/TAF versus F/TDF. High FTC and FTC-TP concentrations in all compartments support the potential of F/TAF as a new PrEP combination for women.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8144741PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100893DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

versus f/tdf
20
f/taf versus
12
tenofovir alafenamide
8
prevention hiv
8
women randomized
8
f/tdf
8
f/taf
8
october 2016
8
2016 participant
8
lower f/taf
8

Similar Publications

Purpose: Transgender women are disproportionately affected by HIV and are underutilizing preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP). The lower uptake of PrEP by transgender women may be, in part, owing to the perception that taking PrEP may lower the efficacy of gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) or to provider concerns that GAHT may lower the efficacy of PrEP.

Methods: DISCOVER was a randomized, double-blind, noninferiority trial comparing emtricitabine (FTC, F) and tenofovir alafenamide (F/TAF) versus emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (F/TDF) as PrEP among transgender women and cisgender men who have sex with men (MSM).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The transgender community has expressed concerns regarding drug-drug interactions between HIV-pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and gender-affirming hormones. In this study, we evaluated emtricitabine (F, FTC)/tenofovir (TFV) disoporoxil fumarate (TDF) pharmacokinetics (PK) among adolescent and young adult transgender persons receiving gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT). This was a prospective, observational study among transgender women (TW) and men (TM) without HIV, 15-24 years of age, receiving GAHT (estradiol with/without spironolactone, or testosterone).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Transgender persons have an increased vulnerability to HIV infection yet have not been well-represented in past clinical trials for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Because of this, there are few data available to understand whether gender-affirming hormone concentrations are influenced by PrEP agents in transgender men (TM) and transgender women (TW). The objective of this study was to compare gender-affirming hormone concentrations with versus without emtricitabine (F, FTC)-tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Cost-Effectiveness of Long-Acting Injectable HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis in the United States : A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Ann Intern Med

April 2022

Division of Infectious Diseases, Medical Practice Evaluation Center, and Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia (R.P.W.).

Background: The HIV Prevention Trials Network (HPTN) 083 trial demonstrated the superiority of long-acting injectable cabotegravir (CAB-LA) compared with oral emtricitabine-tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (F/TDF) for HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP).

Objective: To identify the maximum price premium (that is, greatest possible price differential) that society should be willing to accept for the additional benefits of CAB-LA over tenofovir-based PrEP among men who have sex with men and transgender women (MSM/TGW) in the United States.

Design: Simulation, cost-effectiveness analysis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study investigated the pharmacokinetics and safety of two HIV prevention treatments, F/TDF and F/TAF, in uninfected women.
  • F/TAF showed significantly higher concentrations of the active drug in certain tissues, suggesting it might be a more effective option compared to F/TDF for protecting against HIV via rectal transmission.
  • Furthermore, F/TDF users reported more gastrointestinal adverse events, indicating that F/TAF may have a better safety profile.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!