Background: Given the poor synthetic function of cirrhotic liver, successful resection for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) necessitates the ability to achieve resections with tumor free margins.
Aim: To validate post hepatectomy liver failure score (PHLF), compare it to other established systems and to stratify risks in patients with cirrhosis who underwent curative liver resection for HCC.
Methods: Between December 2010 and January 2017, 120 patients underwent curative resection for HCC in patients with cirrhosis were included, the pre-operative, operative and post-operative factors were recorded to stratify patients' risks of decompensation, survival, and PHLF.
Results: The preoperative model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score [odds ratio (OR) = 2.7, 95%CI: 1.2-5.7, = 0.013], tumor diameter (OR = 5.4, 95%CI: 2-14.8, = 0.001) and duration of hospital stay (OR = 2.5, 95%CI: 1.5-4.2, = 0.001) were significant independent predictors of hepatic decompensation after resection. While the preoperative MELD score [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.37, 95%CI: 1.16-1.62, < 0.001] and different grades of PHLF (grade A: HR = 2.33, 95%CI: 0.59-9.24; Grade B: HR = 3.15, 95%CI: 1.11-8.95; Grade C: HR = 373.41, 95%CI: 66.23-2105.43; < 0.001) and HCC recurrence (HR = 11.67, 95%CI: 4.19-32.52, < 0.001) were significant independent predictors for survival.
Conclusion: Preoperative MELD score and tumor diameter can independently predict hepatic decompensation. While, preoperative MELD score, different grades of PHLF and HCC recurrence can precisely predict survival.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8131904 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v13.i5.424 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!