Military deployment's impact on the surgeon's practice.

J Trauma Acute Care Surg

From the 96 Medical Group, Department of Surgery (A.H., H.M., M.H.), Eglin AFB, Florida; Naval Medical Research Unit San Antonio (I.Q., J.G.), Combat Casualty Care Directorate, San Antonio, Texas; Department of Surgery (M.V.), Naval Hospital Camp Pendleton, Camp Pendleton; Department of Surgery (K.I.), Keesler Medical Center, Keesler AFB, MS; Naval Medical Center San Diego (M.D.T.), San Diego, California; William Beaumont Army Medical Center (E.D.), El Paso, Texas; US Africa Command (J.T.), HQ Unit AFRICOM, APO AE, Stuttgart, Germany; and Joint Trauma System (J.M.G.), Defense Center of Excellence, San Antonio, Texas.

Published: August 2021

AI Article Synopsis

  • As the U.S. pulls back from overseas conflicts, general surgeons are still deployed, which impacts their surgical readiness due to low case volumes during deployment training and periods of reintegration.
  • A study analyzed the surgery case logs of military surgeons before and after deployment, revealing a significant 4.8% drop in case counts leading up to deployment and a 6% increase after returning.
  • The findings highlight the need for measures to address the decline in surgical practice before deployment to ensure that general surgeons maintain their skills and patient care standards.

Article Abstract

Background: As the United States withdraws from overseas conflicts, general surgeons remain deployed in support of global operations. Surgeons and surgical teams are foundational to combat casualty care; however, currently, there are few casualty producing events. Low surgical volume and acuity can have detrimental effects on surgical readiness for those frequently deployed. The surgical team cycle of deployment involves predeployment training, drawdown of clinical practice, deployment, postdeployment reintegration, and rebuilding of a patient panel. This study aims to assess these effects on typical general surgeon practices. Quantifying the overall impact of deployment may help refine and implement measures to mitigate the effects on skill retention and patient care.

Methods: Surgeon case logs of eligible surgeons deploying between January 1, 2017, and January 1, 2020, were included from participating military treatment facilities. Eligible surgeons were surgeons whose case logs were primarily at a single military treatment facility 26 weeks before and after deployment and whose deployment duration, location, and number of deployed cases were obtainable.

Results: Starting 26 weeks prior to deployment, analyzing in 1-week intervals toward deployment time, case count decreased by 4.8% (p < 0.0001). With each 1-week interval, postdeployment up to the 26-week mark, case count increased by 6% (p < 0.0001). Cases volumes most prominently drop 3 weeks prior to deployment and do not reach normal levels until approximately 7 weeks postdeployment. Case volumes were similar across service branches.

Conclusion: There is a significant decrease in the number of cases performed before deployment and increase after return regardless of military branch. The perideployment surgical volume decline should be understood and mitigated appropriately; predeployment training, surgical skill retention, and measures to safely reintegrate surgeons back into their practice should be further developed and implemented.

Level Of Evidence: Economic/Decision, Level III.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000003279DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

deployment
9
surgical volume
8
predeployment training
8
skill retention
8
case logs
8
eligible surgeons
8
military treatment
8
weeks prior
8
prior deployment
8
case count
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!