The choice of treatment for Sanders Type II and Type III calcaneal fractures remains controversial with unclear patient functional outcomes. A meta-analysis was done to compare the functional outcome of ORIF vs primary subtalar arthrodesis (PSA) according to American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) hindfoot-ankle scores. The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library Databases were searched by two independent evaluators. Fourteen studies met the eligible criteria. ORIF of 501 Type II and Type III fractures was compared to primary subtalar arthrodesis treatment of 57 Type II and Type III fractures. AOFAS for a mixed ORIF group of "Type II and III" fractures was 82.16 ± 1.58 at average follow-up of 25.3 months. For a mixed PSA group of "Type II and III" fractures, the AOFAS was 74.22 ± 2.45 at average follow-up of 28.0 months. This showed a difference between ORIF and primary subtalar arthrodesis of 7.94 points (95% confidence interval [CI] = 7.75-7.98; p value .004) favoring ORIF when adjusting for minimally invasive and percutaneous methods. Without adjustment, there was a difference of 6.54 points favoring ORIF (95% CI = 6.22-6.46; p value .017). In conclusion, while high-quality randomized controlled trials comparing ORIF to primary subtalar arthrodesis for Type II and Type III fractures would further elucidate superior treatment outcomes, this meta-analysis of available data shows a tendency for ORIF of Type II and Type III Sanders calcaneal fractures to have a better functional outcome at approximately 2 years postoperatively compared to primary subtalar arthrodesis.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2021.04.009 | DOI Listing |
J Orthop Surg Res
January 2025
Orthopaedic Department, Assiut Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University Hospital, Assiut University, Kasr Elini Street, Number 7, P.O. Box 110, Assuit, 71515, Egypt.
Aims: Which is the best extensile lateral (ELA) or sinus tarsi (STA) approach for osteosynthesis displaced intraarticular calcaneal fracture (DIACF) is still debatable. The current RCT's primary objective was to compare the complications incidence after open reduction and internal fixation of DIACFs through STA vs. ELA.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFActa Orthop
December 2024
Sint Maartenskliniek Research, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Background And Purpose: Our primary aim was to compare the early complication rate (< 6 weeks postoperatively) after open or arthroscopic fusion of the subtalar joint. Secondary outcomes included late complications (> 6 weeks postoperatively), function, pain, and patient satisfaction.
Methods: In this prospective randomized controlled trial, patients listed for subtalar joint fusion were included and randomized for open or arthroscopic fusion.
Foot Ankle Int
November 2024
Department of Foot and Ankle Surgery, The Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
Foot Ankle Orthop
July 2024
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Background: Nonunion after ankle or hindfoot arthrodesis is associated with poor outcomes. Cellular bone allograft is an alternative to autograft for use in these procedures. The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the early efficacy and safety of cellular bone allograft use in hindfoot and ankle arthrodesis procedures.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Biomech
October 2024
Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, 590 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, 36 S Wasatch Dr., Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA. Electronic address:
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!