Objective: to validate the content and appearance of the educational booklet "You can control your child's asthma - let's learn together?" with parents and caregivers of children with asthma.

Methods: this is a methodological study, carried out with 34 mothers and caregivers of children, from two to 10 years old, diagnosed with asthma. The educational booklet validation was performed using Content Validity Index (CVI) and assessment of comprehension, attractiveness, self-efficacy, persuasion, and cultural acceptance domains.

Results: the booklet was considered clear (99.8%) and relevant (100%), with a global CVI of 0.99. Domain assessment proved to be an easy-to-understand tool, culturally appropriate, attractive, with persuasive power and promoting self-efficacy.

Conclusion: the booklet is valid and adequate for promoting the self-efficacy of parents and caregivers in childhood asthma control and management, potentially scalable to other realities of outpatient care.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2020-0353DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

educational booklet
12
asthma control
8
control management
8
parents caregivers
8
caregivers children
8
booklet
5
content validation
4
validation educational
4
asthma
4
booklet asthma
4

Similar Publications

Objectives: Cancer-related cachexia affects approximately 50% to 80% of cancer patients and contributes significantly to cancer-related mortality, accounting for 20% of deaths. This multifactorial syndrome is characterized by systemic inflammation, anorexia, and elevated energy expenditure, leading to severe weight loss and muscle wasting. Understanding the underlying mechanisms is critical for developing effective interventions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The Multicomponent Intervention to Improve Acute Myocardial Infarction Care (MIMIC) was developed to increase uptake of evidence-based care for acute myocardial infarction in Tanzania. MIMIC consists of five components: triage cards, pocket cards, an online training module, patient educational pamphlets, and clinical champions. Our aim was to determine the acceptability and feasibility of this intervention among emergency department (ED) providers in Tanzania.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Self-directed interventions are cost-effective for patients with cancer and their family caregivers, but barriers to use can compromise adherence and efficacy.

Aim: Pilot a Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART) to develop a time-varying dyadic self-management intervention that follows a stepped-care approach in providing different types of guidance to optimize the delivery of Coping-Together, a dyadic self-directed self-management intervention.

Methods: 48 patients with cancer and their caregivers were randomized in Stage 1 to: (a) Coping-Together (included a workbook and 6 booklets) or (b) Coping-Together + lay telephone guidance.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Informational Needs of Lung Cancer Patients and Caregivers.

J Cancer Educ

January 2025

Cancer Education Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Cancer Health Literacy Research Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.

The provision of information is critical to the care and support for cancer patients. Relevant information leads to lower anxiety, increased patient control and involvement in decision-making, greater satisfaction, and improved coping skills. To identify the unique needs of lung cancer patients and their caregivers (LPCs), a needs assessment was conducted.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of education programs for patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) as part of their care alongside pharmacological treatment and exercise.
  • A thorough literature search was conducted in major databases, focusing on studies that involved patient education related to axSpA and using strict PICO criteria to assess outcomes like disease activity, functionality, and quality of life.
  • Out of 494 studies, only 6 randomized clinical trials were included for analysis, with sample sizes from 41 to 65 participants, indicating variability in program leadership and intervention durations.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!