A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Evaluation of sensitivity profiles to fosfomycin in bacterial urine samples from outpatients. | LitMetric

Objective: To evaluate and compare the susceptibilities of bacteria found in outpatient cultures to fosfomycin and other main antibiotics commonly available in clinical practice.

Study Design: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted using 2,673 positive urine cultures collected between 2014 and 2017 at private laboratories located in the cities of Niterói and São Gonçalo. Susceptibilities to fosfomycin and other antibiotics were tested using the McNemar test with the level of significance set at 5 %.

Results: Out of the 2,673 samples tested, 94.1 % were susceptible to fosfomycin. Escherichia coli was responsible for 68.8 % of the positive samples, and susceptibility to fosfomycin was observed in 97.9 % of these cases. Susceptibility to fosfomycin in Klebsiella spp. represented 86.6 % of cases, Enterococcus spp., 94.9 % and Proteus mirabilis, 83.3 %. The highest rate of susceptibility for E. coli was observed with fosfomycin, with the only exception being imipenem (p < 0.001). Klebsiella spp. showed a similar profile, except that there was no difference between susceptibilities to fosfomycin and gentamicin (p = 0.91). Susceptibility of Enterococcus spp. to fosfomycin was like that of nitrofurantoin and ampicillin. Finally, the susceptibility of P. mirabilis to fosfomycin was greater than it was for trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and nitrofurantoin.

Conclusions: The microbiological profile established here shows substantial sensitivity to fosfomycin in the urine samples analysed. In most cases, there was a sensitivity profile that was favourable to the use of fosfomycin or at least comparable to the other antibiotics studied.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.05.022DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

fosfomycin
12
urine samples
8
susceptibilities fosfomycin
8
susceptibility fosfomycin
8
klebsiella spp
8
enterococcus spp
8
susceptibility
5
evaluation sensitivity
4
sensitivity profiles
4
profiles fosfomycin
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!