trying...
340312562021112220211125
1091-6490118222021Jun01Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of AmericaProc Natl Acad Sci U S AReply to Martinón-Torres et al. and Higham and Douka: Refusal to acknowledge dating complexities of Fuyan Cave strengthens our case.e210481811810.1073/pnas.2104818118CurnoeDarrenD0000-0001-8622-4141Australian Museum Research Institute, Australian Museum, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia darrencurnoe@icloud.com.LiHong-ChunHC0000-0001-9614-7119Department of Geosciences, National Taiwan University, 106 Taipei, Taiwan.ZhouBo-YanBYMinistry of Education Key Laboratory of Contemporary Anthropology, Fudan University, 200438 Shanghai, China.Institute of Archaeological Science, Fudan University, 200438 Shanghai, China.SunChangCMinistry of Education Key Laboratory of Contemporary Anthropology, Fudan University, 200438 Shanghai, China.Institute of Archaeological Science, Fudan University, 200438 Shanghai, China.DuPan-XinPXMinistry of Education Key Laboratory of Contemporary Anthropology, Fudan University, 200438 Shanghai, China.Institute of Archaeological Science, Fudan University, 200438 Shanghai, China.WenShao-QingSQ0000-0003-1223-4720Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Contemporary Anthropology, Fudan University, 200438 Shanghai, China.Institute of Archaeological Science, Fudan University, 200438 Shanghai, China.SunXue-FengXF0000-0002-2688-4663School of Geography and Ocean Science, Nanjing University, 210023 Nanjing, China.LiHuiH0000-0002-7642-215XMinistry of Education Key Laboratory of Contemporary Anthropology, Fudan University, 200438 Shanghai, China.Institute of Archaeological Science, Fudan University, 200438 Shanghai, China.Fudan-Datong Institute of Chinese Origin, Shanxi Academy of Advanced Research and Innovation, 037006 Datong, China.engLetterComment
United StatesProc Natl Acad Sci U S A75058760027-8424IMProc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Feb 23;118(8):e2019158118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.201915811833558418Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jun 1;118(22):e2102961118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.210296111834031253Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jun 1;118(22):e2103798118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.210379811834031254CavesRadiometric DatingThe authors declare no competing interest.202152566202152660202111236020211124ppublish34031256PMC817918110.1073/pnas.21048181182104818118Martinón-Torres M., et al. ., On the misidentification and unreliable context of the new “human teeth” from Fuyan Cave (China). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 10.1073/pnas.2102961118 (2021).10.1073/pnas.2102961118PMC817921034031253Sun X.-f., et al. ., Ancient DNA and multimethod dating confirm the late arrival of anatomically modern humans in southern China. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 118, e2019158118 (2021).PMC792360733558418Liu W., et al. ., The earliest unequivocally modern humans in southern China. Nature 526, 696–699 (2015).26466566Higham T. F. G., Douka K., The reliability of late radiocarbon dates from the Paleolithic of southern China. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 10.1073/pnas.2103798118 (2021).10.1073/pnas.2103798118PMC817915734031254Brock F., et al. ., Reliability of nitrogen content (%N) and carbon: Nitrogen atomic ratios (C:N) as indicators of collagen preservation suitable for radiocarbon dating. Radiocarbon 54, 879–886 (2012).Dunbar E., Cook G. T., Naysmith P., Tripney B. G., Xu S., AMS 14C dating at the Scottish Universities Environmental Research Centre (SUERC) radiocarbon dating laboratory. Radiocarbon 58, 9–23 (2016).Higham T. F. G., Jacobi R. M., Bronk Ramsey C., AMS radiocarbon dating of ancient bone using ultrafiltration. Radiocarbon 48, 179–195 (2006).Shen G., et al. ., Mass spectrometric U-series dating of Huanglong Cave in Hubei Province, Central China: Evidence for early presence of modern humans in eastern Asia. J. Hum. Evol. 65, 162–167 (2013).23870460Bae C. J., et al. ., Modern human teeth from Late Pleistocene Luna Cave (Guangxi, China). Quat. Int. 354, 169–183 (2014).trying2...