Background: Increased use of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and reduced open surgical repair (OSR), has decreased postoperative mortality after elective repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). The choice between EVAR or OSR depends on aneurysm anatomy, and the experience and preference of the vascular surgeon, and therefore differs between hospitals. The aim of this study was to investigate the current mortality risk difference (RD) between EVAR and OSR, and the effect of hospital preference for EVAR on overall mortality.
Methods: Primary elective infrarenal or juxtarenal aneurysm repairs registered in the Dutch Surgical Aneurysm Audit (2013-2017) were analysed. First, mortality in hospitals with a higher preference for EVAR (high-EVAR group) was compared with that in hospitals with a lower EVAR preference (low-EVAR group), divided by the median percentage of EVAR. Second, the mortality RD between EVAR and OSR was determined by unadjusted and adjusted linear regression and propensity-score (PS) analysis and then by instrumental-variable (IV) analysis, adjusting for unobserved confounders; percentage EVAR by hospital was used as the IV.
Results: A total of 11 997 patients were included. The median hospital rate of EVAR was 76.6 per cent. The overall mortality RD between high- and low-EVAR hospitals was 0.1 (95 per cent -0.5 to 0.4) per cent. The OSR mortality rate was significantly higher among high-EVAR hospitals than low-EVAR hospitals: 7.3 versus 4.0 per cent (RD 3.3 (1.4 to 5.3) per cent). The EVAR mortality rate was also higher in high-EVAR hospitals: 0.9 versus 0.7 per cent (RD 0.2 (-0.0 to 0.6) per cent). The RD following unadjusted, adjusted, and PS analysis was 4.2 (3.7 to 4.8), 4.4 (3.8 to 5.0), and 4.7 (4.1 to 5.3) per cent in favour of EVAR over OSR. However, the RD after IV analysis was not significant: 1.3 (-0.9 to 3.6) per cent.
Conclusion: Even though EVAR has a lower mortality rate than OSR, the overall effect is offset by the high mortality rate after OSR in hospitals with a strong focus on EVAR.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8140201 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zraa065 | DOI Listing |
Ann Surg
November 2024
Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX.
Objective: To compare target artery (TA) outcomes after fenestrated or branched endovascular aortic repair (FB-EVAR) versus open surgical repair (OSR) of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs).
Background: Few studies have compared TA outcomes after endovascular incorporation and open reconstruction.
Methods: Among consecutive patients who underwent elective OSR or FB-EVAR of TAAAs (2008-2020), we reviewed those who had postoperative imaging studies evaluating TA.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg
November 2024
Department of Vascular Surgery, Rijnstate, Arnhem, the Netherlands; Department of Vascular Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis, Dordrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Vascular Surgery, Isala, Zwolle, the Netherlands; Department of Vascular Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis, 's- Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands; Department of Vascular Surgery, Maxima MC, Eindhoven, the Netherlands; Multi-Modality Medical Imaging Group, Techmed Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
Objective: This retrospective, multicentre, observational cohort study aimed to assess the long term quality of life, health status, and residential destination after successful treatment of a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) treated by endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) or open surgical repair (OSR).
Methods: Consecutive patients from five large teaching hospitals with a computed tomography confirmed rAAA from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2018 were included. Mortality, morbidity, discharge destination, and residential destination through follow up were registered.
Rev Cardiovasc Med
October 2024
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, 06800 Ankara, Turkey.
J Vasc Surg
October 2024
Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY.
Objective: Aneurysm neck anatomy in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAAs) is often complex, limiting the feasibility of endovascular repair (EVAR). The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of EVAR and open surgical repair (OSR) for treatment of rAAAs in patients with hostile neck anatomy (HNA). The secondary aim was to review the clinical characteristics and anatomic risk factors predictive of mortality.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Cardiovasc Surg (Torino)
October 2024
Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA -
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!