Provider Reactions to Opioid-Prescribing Report Cards.

J Public Health Manag Pract

Departments of Epidemiology (Ms Alishahi and Dr Runyan) and Community and Behavioral Health (Drs Brooks-Russell and Runyan), Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, Colorado; Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Denver, Colorado (Ms Olson); and Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz, Aurora, Colorado (Dr Hoppe).

Published: February 2022

Objective: To evaluate prescribers' reactions and self-reported intentions to change prescribing behavior in response to opioid-prescribing report cards.

Design: We surveyed a sample of licensed prescribers in the state of Colorado registered with the state's prescription drug monitoring program (PDMP).

Setting: In 2018, Colorado disseminated tailored opioid-prescribing report cards to increase use of the PDMP and improve opioid prescribing. Report cards reflected individual prescribing history and compared individuals with an aggregate of others in the same specialty. Surveys were sent to approximately 29 000 prescribers registered with the PDMP 12 weeks after report card distribution. If respondents were not sent a report card, they were shown a sample report. Respondents were asked about their perceptions of the usefulness of the information and intentions to change their prescribing.

Participants: A total of 3784 prescribers responded to the survey.

Main Outcome Measures: Respondents were asked about their attitudes and reactions to an opioid-prescribing report card. Answers were given in the form of a 5-point Likert scale or multiple-choice questions.

Results: Of those who responded, 53.6% were male and nearly half (49.5%) had spent more than 20 years in practice. Among prescribers who recalled receiving a report card, most felt the reports were easy to understand (87.4%) and provided new information (82.8%). Two-thirds of prescribers who saw their reports felt the information accurately reflected their prescribing practices. Overall, 40.0% reported they planned to change their prescribing behaviors as a result of the information provided. The most useful metrics identified by prescribers were the number of patients with multiple providers and the number of patients receiving dangerous combination therapy.

Conclusions: Overall, perceptions of the usefulness and accuracy of the report cards were positive. Understanding how the reports are perceived is a key factor to their use and influence. Further tailoring of the report to prescribers of different specialties and experience may enhance the effectiveness of the report cards.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000001382DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

report cards
20
opioid-prescribing report
16
report card
16
report
12
reactions opioid-prescribing
8
intentions change
8
change prescribing
8
respondents asked
8
number patients
8
prescribers
7

Similar Publications

Stroke is a leading cause of disability among adults, and any treatment that improves functional outcome, like higher intensity of rehabilitation therapy, can significantly reduce its financial burden. Clinicians on a stroke rehabilitation ward are expected to track and nationally report on rehabilitation time to contribute to the Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme (SSNAP), a process that was manual, paper-based, time-consuming and redundant, which in turn impacted on a reduction in clinical time to provide stroke rehabilitation. We aimed to release 20% of clinical time by reducing inefficiencies within their time management and reporting process, ensuring that clinicians had more time available for direct patient care.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Malaria remains a major public health threat in Sub-Saharan Africa. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) estimates, species account for nearly 100% of the malaria cases occurring on the African continent. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), falciparum malaria predominates, but non-falciparum species are also present in Africa.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The Multicomponent Intervention to Improve Acute Myocardial Infarction Care (MIMIC) was developed to increase uptake of evidence-based care for acute myocardial infarction in Tanzania. MIMIC consists of five components: triage cards, pocket cards, an online training module, patient educational pamphlets, and clinical champions. Our aim was to determine the acceptability and feasibility of this intervention among emergency department (ED) providers in Tanzania.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Context: Athletic trainers (ATs) are in a unique position to mitigate the negative impact of social determinants of health (SDH) in their patients. In the secondary school setting, understanding common SDH may inform strategies that reduce these impacts. However, little is known about the types of SDH that ATs observe in patients in this setting.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

N-Acetyltyrosine as a Biomarker of Parenteral Nutrition Administration in First-Tier Newborn Screening Assays.

Int J Neonatal Screen

December 2024

Division of Laboratory Sciences, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Hwy NE, S110-3, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA.

Parenteral nutrition (PN) is a nutrient solution administered intravenously (IV) to premature babies. PN causes elevations of some amino acids in blood samples that are also biomarkers used in newborn screening (NBS). Therefore, PN status must be annotated by clinicians on dried blood spot (DBS) cards to reduce NBS laboratory burdens associated with potential false results; however, NBS laboratories continue to receive DBSs with misannotated PN status.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!