Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Articular cartilage has very poor intrinsic healing ability and its repair remains a significant clinical challenge. To promote neocartilage regeneration, we fabricated two collagen (Col) scaffolds functionalized with a porcine decellularized extracellular matrix (dECM) in the forms of particle and solution named pE-Col and sE-Col, respectively. Their differences were systematically compared, including the biochemical compositions, scaffold properties, cell-material interactions, and cartilage regeneration. While it is demonstrated that both forms of dECM could enhance the cell recruitment, proliferation, and chondrogenesis of bone marrow stem cells (BMSCs) , better performance was seen in the sE-Col group, which could quickly provide a more favorable chondrogenic microenvironment for endogenous BMSCs. The superiority of sE-Col was also proved by our study, which showed that the sE-Col scaffold achieved better structural hyaline-like neocartilage formation and subchondral bone repair compared to the pE-Col scaffold, according to the gross morphology, biological assessment, and micro-CT imaging analysis. Together, this study suggests that the sE-Col scaffold holds great potential in developing the one-step microfracture-based strategy for cartilage repair and also reminds us that despite dECM being a promising biomaterial in tissue engineering, the optimization of the proper processing methodology would be a crucial consideration in the future design of dECM-based scaffolds in articular cartilage regeneration.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c07530 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!