A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Treatment of anal fistula with FiLaC: results of a 10-year experience with 175 patients. | LitMetric

Treatment of anal fistula with FiLaC: results of a 10-year experience with 175 patients.

Tech Coloproctol

Department of General Surgery, Hospital Santo Spirito, ASL CN2, Regione Piemonte, Italy.

Published: August 2021

Background: Treatment of fistula-in-ano with fistula laser closure (FiLaC) is a sphincter-saving procedure indicated for patients with complex anal fistulas. The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical results of a 10-year experience with FiLaC.

Methods: Data from patients with cryptoglandular anal fistula who underwent laser closure with FiLaC in June 2009-May 2019 were evaluated. The primary study endpoint was healing rate. Secondary endpoints were evaluation of morbidity and assessment of possible predictive factors of failure.

Results: Out of a total of 180 patients, 5 had been lost to follow-up. 175 patients [m:f: 115:60; median age 49 years (range18-81 years)] with cryptoglandular fistulas treated with FiLaC were included in the study. Fistulas were transphincteric in 152 (86.8%) cases, intersphincteric in 18 (10.3%), and suprasphincteric in 5 (2.9%). A seton or draining silicon loop was placed in 142 (81.8%) patients at a median of 14 weeks (range10-28 weeks) prior to FiLaC. At median follow-up of 60 months (range 9-120 months), the overall primary healing rate was 66.8% (117/175). Thirty-eight patients (21.7%) failed to heal. Twenty out of 175 (11.4%) patients had recurrence at median follow-up of 18 months (range 9-50 months). Patients in whom a seton/loop was inserted for drainage at the first-stage procedure had a statistically significant higher rate of success (100/142, 70.4% vs. 17/33, 51.5%, respectively; p 0.0377; odds ratio 0.45). Forty-eight patients were reoperated on at a median of 15 months (range 12-20 months) after laser treatment. Twenty-six underwent redo laser closure with FiLaC, and 12 of them healed (46%), for a secondary success rate of 73.7%.

Conclusions: Longer follow-up confirms the efficacy of FiLaC in the treatment of complex anal fistulas. Its use and implementation should be encouraged.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10151-021-02461-4DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

laser closure
12
closure filac
12
patients
10
anal fistula
8
10-year experience
8
175 patients
8
complex anal
8
anal fistulas
8
healing rate
8
median follow-up
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!