Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background And Aim: Although one of the causes of dyspeptic symptoms in functional dyspepsia patients is gastric hypersensitivity, there is currently no routine endoscopic gastric hypersensitivity test. We developed a new endoscopic method for gastric hypersensitivity testing. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether this method is useful for evaluating gastric hypersensitivity in drug-resistant functional dyspepsia patients who were strongly suspected of having gastric hypersensitivity.
Methods: Twenty-seven drug-resistant functional dyspepsia patients and 27 nonfunctional dyspepsia patients were recruited. Gastric pressure was assessed using an external pressure transducer, and the CO insufflation volume was measured using an endoscopic CO-supplied device and flow meter. The following variables were examined: gastric pressure at baseline and gastric pressure, the CO insufflation volume, and compliance of the stomach when patients initially felt abdominal tension following CO insufflation.
Results: No significant differences were observed in baseline gastric pressure or compliance of the stomach between the groups. Drug-resistant functional dyspepsia patients had a significantly smaller CO insufflation volume and lower gastric pressure when symptoms developed than nonfunctional dyspepsia patients. Based on a cutoff value of 1.25 L by receiver operating characteristic curves, sensitivity and specificity for gastric pressure were 85.0 and 96.3%, respectively. Similarly, based on a cutoff value of 12.7 mmHg, sensitivity and specificity for the CO insufflation volume were 81.5 and 81.5%, respectively.
Conclusion: This endoscopic gastric hypersensitivity testing is a useful tool for evaluating the presence of gastric hypersensitivity.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8114979 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12544 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!