A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Protective mechanical ventilation with optimal PEEP during RARP improves oxygenation and pulmonary indexes. | LitMetric

Protective mechanical ventilation with optimal PEEP during RARP improves oxygenation and pulmonary indexes.

Trials

Department of Anesthesia, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, East Qingchun Road 3, Hangzhou, 310016, Zhejiang, China.

Published: May 2021

Background: This trial aimed to evaluate the effects of a protective ventilation strategy on oxygenation/pulmonary indexes in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in the steep Trendelenburg position.

Methods: In phase 1, the most optimal positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) was determined in 25 patients at 11 cmHO. In phase 2, 64 patients were randomized to the traditional ventilation group with tidal volume (VT) of 9 ml/kg of predicted body weight (PBW) and the protective ventilation group with VT of 7 ml/kg of PBW with optimal PEEP and recruitment maneuvers (RMs). The primary endpoint was the intraoperative and postoperative PaO/FiO. The secondary endpoints were the PaCO, SpO, modified clinical pulmonary infection score (mCPIS), and the rate of complications in the postoperative period.

Results: Compared with controls, PaO/FiO in the protective group increased after the second RM (P=0.018), and the difference remained until postoperative day 3 (P=0.043). PaCO showed transient accumulation in the protective group after the first RM (T2), but this phenomenon disappeared with time. SpO in the protective group was significantly higher during the first three postoperative days. Lung compliance was significantly improved after the second RM in the protective group (P=0.025). The mCPIS was lower in the protective group on postoperative day 3 (0.59 (1.09) vs. 1.46 (1.27), P=0.010).

Conclusion: A protective ventilation strategy with lower VT combined with optimal PEEP and RMs could improve oxygenation and reduce mCPIS in patients undergoing RARP.

Trial Registration: ChiCTR ChiCTR1800015626 . Registered on 12 April 2018.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8135157PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05310-9DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

protective group
20
optimal peep
12
protective ventilation
12
protective
9
ventilation strategy
8
patients undergoing
8
ventilation group
8
postoperative day
8
group
7
ventilation
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!