AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study aimed to evaluate Mayo Clinic's Department of Health Sciences Research (HSR) faculty and staff perceptions of a proposed Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) plan to tackle systemic biases like racism and sexism.
  • - Key components of the DEI plan emphasize diverse recruitment, comprehensive training for all staff, and implementing a feedback system regarding diversity and inclusion efforts.
  • - While most respondents supported aspects of the plan, reactions varied among different diversity and professional groups, highlighting the need for tailored approaches in DEI initiatives.

Article Abstract

Objective: To mitigate the impact of racism, sexism, and other systemic biases, it is essential for organizations to develop strategies to address their diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) climates. The objective of this formative evaluation was to assess Mayo Clinic Department of Health Sciences Research (HSR) faculty and staff perceptions toward a proposed departmental DEI plan and to explore findings by diversity and professional subgroups.

Materials And Methods: Key plan components include recruitment and support for diverse individuals; training for all HSR employees and leaders; and a review system to capture diversity and inclusion feedback for leaders. Additional activities include building inclusion "nudges" into existing performance reviews. To assess pre-implementation beliefs about specific plan components, we polled attendees at a departmental staff meeting in July 2020.

Results: Overall, respondents ( = 162) commonly endorsed a blinded promotion review process and DEI training for all staff and leaders as most important. In contrast, respondents expressed less support for plan activities related to "nudges." However, attitudes among certain diversity or professional groups toward specific plan activities diverged from their non-diversity group counterparts. Qualitative feedback indicated awareness of the need to address DEI issues.

Discussion: Overall, HSR faculty and staff respondents conveyed support for the plan. However, some specific plan activities were perceived differently by members of certain diversity or professional subgroups.

Conclusion: These findings present a DEI framework on which other institutions can build and point to future directions for how DEI activities may be differentially perceived by impacted faculty and staff.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8111694PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2020.575DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

faculty staff
16
diversity professional
12
specific plan
12
plan activities
12
attitudes diversity
8
diversity equity
8
equity inclusion
8
inclusion dei
8
plan
8
dei plan
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!