A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Prediction of Extubation Failure in COVID-19. | LitMetric

Background: [Formula: see text] may be a reliable noninvasive alternative to the [Formula: see text] index. Furthermore, the ROX index (ie, the ratio of [Formula: see text] to breathing frequency) has been validated to predict high-flow nasal cannula failure in subjects under spontaneous breathing. However, these indices have not been tested in subjects with COVID-19 receiving invasive mechanical ventilation. This study aims to verify the correlation between both the ROX index and [Formula: see text] with [Formula: see text] and the ratio of [Formula: see text] to breathing frequency, and to determine the accuracy of the indices that use [Formula: see text] for the prediction of extubation failure in subjects with COVID-19.

Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted from May 15, 2020, to June 15, 2020, with subjects with COVID-19 on invasive mechanical ventilation. Indices using [Formula: see text] in the formula were compared to those using [Formula: see text]. Additionally, the performance of the indices in predicting extubation failure was evaluated.

Results: This study included 69 subjects age 64.8 ± 14.6 y. There were no differences between the median values of the indices, including between the ROX index and [Formula: see text] to breathing frequency ( = .40) or between [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] ( = .83). When comparing the ROX index with the [Formula: see text] index to breathing frequency, they were found to be strongly correlated (R = 0.75 [95% CI 0.6763-0.8152], < .001). The comparison of [Formula: see text] with [Formula: see text] revealed R = 0.70 (95% CI 0.563-0.749, < .001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the ROX index to determine extubation failure was 0.74 ( = .01), whereas for [Formula: see text] it was 0.78 ( < .001).

Conclusions: The indices presented a good correlation in subjects with COVID-19 on invasive mechanical ventilation, and both the ROX index and [Formula: see text] can discriminate extubation failure in this population.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.4187/respcare.08564DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

[formula text]
68
extubation failure
20
[formula
17
text]
17
text] breathing
16
breathing frequency
16
rox [formula
16
subjects covid-19
12
invasive mechanical
12
mechanical ventilation
12

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!