Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), a fraction of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in the circulatory system, is released from tumor cells and thus carries tumor-specific genetic signatures. Using blood-derived ctDNA to detect somatic mutations has shown great value in guiding cancer targeted therapy. Isolation and detection efficiencies are the key factors affecting the performance of ctDNA detection. To optimize and standardize our clinical practice, in this study, we analyzed the isolation efficiency of four commercial cfDNA purification kits: QIAamp circulating nucleic acid kit, AmoyDx Circulating DNA kits, Microdiag circulating DNA isolation kit, and MagMAX cell-free DNA isolation kit; and the detection efficiency of two mainstream domestic gene mutation detection kits: MicroDiag gene mutation detection kit and Fluorometric real-time PCR Detection Kit for the analysis of gene mutations. Reference materials and plasma samples collected from lung cancer patients and healthy volunteers were used for the analysis. Our results showed that QIAamp circulating nucleic acid kit and Microdiag circulating DNA kit had the highest recovery rate (up to 21.25 ng/mL) for short DNA fragments of about 173 bp which is the peak length of ctDNA. For ctDNA detection, the MicroDiag gene mutation detection kit showed the highest detection rate and sensitivity for detecting mutations at a mutant frequency of 0.5%. This work provides a reliable choice of commercial kits for the clinical application of ctDNA.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00365513.2020.1821394DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

circulating dna
12
gene mutation
12
mutation detection
12
detection kit
12
detection
9
commercial kits
8
circulating tumor
8
dna
8
tumor dna
8
cell-free dna
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!