Despite advancements in the field interventional cardiology, the prognosis in patients who suffer from cardiogenic shock is poor. Over the years, the use of percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices has increased with the aim to improve short- and long-term outcomes. In this article, we aim to review the different modalities available for MCS devices and current literature comparing their uses.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8104314 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/HEARTVIEWS.HEARTVIEWS_92_20 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!