Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Purpose: The aim of the study was to test inter-observer and intra-observer reliability of measuring multiparametric ultrasound in adult livers.
Methods: We prospectively measured shear wave velocity (SWV, m/s), shear wave dispersion slope (SWD, m/s/kHz), attenuation coefficient (ATI, dB/cm/MHz), normalized local variance (NLV), and echo intensity ratio of liver to kidney (L/K ratio) in 21 adults who underwent liver magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF). Intraclass correlation coefficient and 95% Bland-Altman limits of agreement (95% LOA) were used to analyze intra- and inter-observer reproducibility.
Results: Based on liver MRI-PDFF, 21 participants (8 men and 13 women, mean age 55 years) were divided into group 1 (11 normal livers, MRI-PDFF <5%) and group 2 (10 steatotic livers, MRI-PDFF ≥5%). ICCs for intra-observer repeatability and inter-observer reproducibility in measuring multiple ultrasound parameters in both normal and steatotic livers were above 0.75. However, 95% confidence interval for measuring SWD in all livers and L/K ratio in normal livers was 0.38-0.90 and 0.47-0.91, respectively. Differences in SWV, SWD, ATI, NLV, L/K ratio, and MRI-PDFF between participants with and without hepatic steatosis were significant (p < .05), whereas serum biomarkers and body mass index were not (p > .05), based on a two-tailed t-test.
Conclusions: The results suggest that the repeatability and reproducibility for measuring liver SWV, ATI, and NLV are moderate to excellent, while those for SWD and L/K ratio are poor. Standardized machine settings, scanning protocols, and operator training are suggested in performing multiparametric ultrasound of the liver.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jum.15751 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!