Background: Computed tomography (CT) is the gold standard for the accurate measurement of cup inclination and anteversion in total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, functional cup position strongly depends on the tilt of the pelvis and thus pelvic tilt in the supine position on the CT table harbors the risk of misinterpretation.

Purpose: To evaluate the influence of pelvic tilt on cup measurements in postoperative CT scans.

Material And Methods: This is a secondary outcome analysis of a prospective study. In 123 patients undergoing THA, anatomic cup inclination and anteversion as measured on postoperative 3D-CT scans were compared between: (i) the anterior pelvic plane (APP) resembling neutral pelvic tilt; and (ii) the coronal plane representing the standard planes on CT. Furthermore, the effect of the variation on cup positions within Lewinnek's safe zone in relation to the applied reference plane was assessed.

Results: Mean pelvic tilt in supine position was -3.5° ± 5.6°. This resulted in a mean difference for anteversion between APP und coronal plane of 2.1° ± 3.7° and of 2.1° ± 1.9° for cup inclination, respectively. The change varied up to 20.2° for cup inclination and up 12.2° for cup anteversion. The overall conversion rate for inclination and/or anteversion regarding Lewinnek's safe zone was high at 23.6% (29/123).

Conclusion: Pelvic tilt affects cup orientation on CT scans depending on the applied reference plane. Standard CT planes should be corrected regarding pelvic tilt before measurements to avoid errors in measurement.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02841851211009466DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pelvic tilt
28
cup inclination
16
cup
10
pelvic
8
cup orientation
8
inclination anteversion
8
tilt supine
8
supine position
8
tilt cup
8
coronal plane
8

Similar Publications

Influence of pelvic position on shoulder range of motion.

BMC Musculoskelet Disord

January 2025

Lecturer of Physical Therapy, Basic Science Department, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Suez University, Suez, Egypt.

Background: pelvis and shoulder are deeply integrated. They are connected by myofascial slings. The pelvic and spinal posture affects the position of the scapula and the activity of its muscles and affects acromio-humeral distance and so that affects shoulder movement.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Disruptions in global sagittal spinal alignment can lead to changes in global sagittal spinal alignment, often manifesting as sagittal malalignment, where the trunk shifts forward. We proposed that these alignment changes are linked to degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DS). The objective was to assess global spinal alignment in low-grade DS using sagittal vertical axis (SVA) classification.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: The potential of robot-assisted (RA) single-position (SP) lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) warrants further investigation. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of RA-SP-LLIF in improving both clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion surgery.

Methods: A total of 59 patients underwent either RA-SP-LLIF (n = 31 cases) or traditional LLIF (n = 28 cases).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: The dynamic alignment of the lumbar spine, pelvis and femur is increasingly studied in hip preservation surgery. However, the interaction between lumbopelvic alignment, acetabular and femoral morphology and its influence on patients' preoperative symptom burden remains poorly understood. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether lumbopelvic malalignment affects osseous hip morphology and exacerbates preoperative patient-reported joint functionality in patients undergoing periacetabular osteotomy (PAO).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aim: Patient specific pre-contoured rods (PSRs) represent a relatively new technological development aimed at improving surgical outcomes and reducing complications in adult spinal deformity surgery. To date, only a limited number of studies have been published comparing PSRs with traditional spinal rods. In this paper, we compare the surgical, imaging, and clinical outcomes of PSRs and traditional spinal rods in a single-center case-matched study.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!