Stepwise ABC system for classification of any type of genetic variant.

Eur J Hum Genet

Department of Human Genetics and Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Published: February 2022

AI Article Synopsis

  • - The ACMG-AMP system classifies genetic variants into five categories: benign, likely benign, VUS, likely pathogenic, and pathogenic, while the new ABC classification model offers an alternative that focuses first on functional assessment and then on clinical relevance.
  • - The ABC system grades variants on two levels: functional (A) and clinical (B), each with a scoring range of 1-5, or a "zero" for insufficient knowledge, and combines these to create a comprehensive classification from A to F.
  • - By distinguishing VUS into two subcategories and linking classifications to standardized comments, the ABC system aims to provide clinicians with clearer insights on variant significance and better guidance for reporting.

Article Abstract

The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG-AMP) system for variant classification is score based with five classes: benign, likely benign, variant of unknown significance (VUS), likely pathogenic, and pathogenic. Here, we present a variant classification model that can be an add-on or alternative to ACMG classification: A stepwise system that can classify any type of genetic variant (e.g., hypomorphic alleles, imprinted alleles, copy number variants, runs of homozygosity, enhancer variants, and variants related to traits). We call it the ABC system because classification is first functional (A), then clinical (B), and optionally a standard comment that fits the clinical question is selected (C). Both steps A and B have 1-5 grading when knowledge is sufficient, if not, class "zero" is assigned. Functional grading (A) only concerns biological consequences with the stages normal function (1), likely normal function (2), hypothetical functional effect (3), likely functional effect (4), and proven functional effect (5). Clinical grading (B) is genotype-phenotype focused with the stages "right type of gene" (1), risk factor (2), and pathogenic (3-5, depending on penetrance). Both grades are listed for each variant and combined to generate a joint class ranging from A to F. Importantly, the A-F classes are linked to standard comments, reflecting laboratory or national policy. In step A, the VUS class is split into class 0 (true unknown) and class 3 (hypothetical functional effect based on molecular predictions or de novo occurrence), providing a rationale for variant-of-interest reporting when the clinical picture could fit the finding. The system gives clinicians a better guide to variant significance.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8821602PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41431-021-00903-zDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

abc system
8
system classification
8
type genetic
8
genetic variant
8
variant classification
8
functional clinical
8
normal function
8
hypothetical functional
8
variant
7
functional
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!