Association between long-term exposure to high levels of ambient air pollution and incidence of lung cancer in a population-based cohort.

Environ Res

Department of Cancer Control and Population Health, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Gyeonggi, 10408, Republic of Korea. Electronic address:

Published: July 2021

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study examined the relationship between long-term exposure to particulate matter (PM) and nitrogen dioxide (NO) with lung cancer incidence in a large population from the Seoul Metropolitan Area in South Korea, involving over 83,000 participants followed from 2007 to 2015.
  • While initial findings showed increased hazard ratios for PM exposure compared to lower exposures in North America and Europe, the overall data indicated that there was no statistically significant association between PM, NO, and lung cancer in the total population.
  • However, subgroup analyses revealed potential links between PM exposure and increased lung cancer risks in individuals with a family history of cancer and among heavy smokers, suggesting that certain high-risk groups might be more affected by air pollution

Article Abstract

Although outdoor air pollution including particulate matter (PM) was classified as carcinogenic to humans based on accumulating epidemiological evidence, these findings were suggested mostly from low-dose environments in North America and Europe. We aimed to examine the association of long-term exposure to PM ≤ 10 and 2.5 μm in diameter (PM and PM) and nitrogen dioxide (NO) with lung cancer incidence using a population-based cohort in the Seoul Metropolitan Area (SMA), South Korea. Our study included 83,478 people residing in the SMA and followed up for 2007-2015 from the National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort. This cohort was constructed based on the National Health Insurance database that contains sociodemographic and medical information under universal health coverage. Individual long-term concentrations of PM, PM, and NO were estimated at people's district-level and annually-updated residential addresses for the previous 5 years by using previously-validated prediction models. We applied a time-dependent Cox proportional hazards model and estimated hazard ratios (HRs) per 10 μg/m and 10 ppb increases in PM and NO, respectively, after adjusting for individual characteristics. During 9 years of follow-up, 489 lung cancer new cases occurred (714,012 person-year). The adjusted HRs for PM were greater than 1 but statistically non-significant (HR = 1.15; 95% CI = 0.88-1.52). We also did not find associations for PM and NO. Despite null associations for the total population, our subgroup analysis suggested associations with PM in family members with cancer (PM: HR = 2.59, 95% CI = 1.26-5.32; PM: 5.55, 1.09-27.91) and in those who have smoked more than 1 pack per day (1.77, 0.96-3.25; 3.81, 1.00-14.44) or for less than 20 years (2.81; 1.13-7.07; 2.02, 0.21-19.23). Our study based on a highly urbanized population exposed to relatively high air pollution provides no evidence of the association between PM and lung cancer incidence in the total population but indicates the potential susceptibility in heavy smokers for relatively short periods and family members of cancer patients. Future studies should re-examine the association using improved exposure assessment and extended population.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.111214DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lung cancer
16
air pollution
12
association long-term
8
long-term exposure
8
population-based cohort
8
cancer incidence
8
national health
8
health insurance
8
total population
8
family members
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!