Background: Studies suggest widespread advantages to peer mentoring programs; however, there is minimal data pertaining to medical students mentoring undergraduate students.
Objectives: To determine the feasibility and perceived effectiveness of a medical student-undergraduate student peer mentorship program.
Methods: A needs assessment guided the development of Pre-Med Pair Up, a program connecting medical student mentors from the Medical College of Wisconsin and other US medical schools to undergraduates at Marquette University and the University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh to provide peer mentorship, premedical resources, and global health information. After 6 months, surveys were distributed to 43 premedical and 26 medical students to evaluate the program. Descriptive statistics and Pearson correlations () were used to assess the relational strength between program components and student confidence and knowledge.
Results: Eleven undergraduate and 26 medical students completed surveys. Most undergraduates expressed increased confidence in abilities as premedical students associated with program involvement (18.2% great, 27.3% moderate, 45.5% minimal, 9.1% no improvement). Increased confidence was strongly correlated with knowledge of volunteer opportunities ( = 0.887, < 0.001) and feelings of preparedness for the medical school application process ( = 0.854, = 0.001) and curriculum ( = 0.871, < 0.001).
Conclusion: While self-reported confidence improved and overall positive program outcomes were statistically significant, the number of participants was low and the number who completed mid-year surveys was even lower. Therefore, no conclusions about program effectiveness were made. Instead, a lessons-learned approach was used to discuss the pilot development, implementation, and suggestions for future program installment.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
AJOG Glob Rep
February 2025
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL (Steinberg, Young, Strom, Andebrhan, Perry, Barry, Holder, Roque, and Yee).
Background: In obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) research, gender disparities permeate through leadership, funding, promotion, mentorship, publishing, compensation, and publicity. Few studies have investigated OBGYN clinical trial leadership as it relates to investigator gender. Thus, we undertook an investigation of principal investigator (PI) gender and clinical trial success.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMJ Open
January 2025
School of Physical Education, Xihua University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
Introduction: The aim of this scoping review is to connect theoretical research related to stress with practical applications to supervision experiences within allied health professions. Understanding the implications of stress between clinical supervisors and allied health students will allow for better insights to improve supervisory methods within clinical training, stronger mentorship and lead to better quality patient care.
Methods And Analysis: This review is conducted according to Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for scoping reviews, which includes defining the research question, developing inclusion criteria and searching for, selecting, extracting and analysing the evidence.
Fed Pract
November 2024
Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Michigan.
Background: The US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is committed to conducting research that improves the health and quality of life of veterans. Mentorship is vital for developing and advancing a novice VA investigator's research agenda; however, there are several barriers to effective research mentorship.
Observations: The VA Clinical Research Mentorship Program was developed to assist clinician investigators with writing and submitting competitive grant applications.
PLOS Glob Public Health
January 2025
Indian Institute of Public Health, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India.
High-quality health systems are key to improving population health outcomes globally. In India, the National Quality Assurance Standards (NQAS) is a certification policy adopted by the government to improve the quality of care in public health facilities. This policy aims to assess public health facilities through a set of comprehensive, pre-defined standards derived from global best practices.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPLoS One
January 2025
School of Human Nutrition, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Objective: Managing blood glucose levels is challenging for elite athletes with type 1 diabetes (T1D) as competition can cause unpredictable fluctuations. While fear of hypoglycemia during physical activity is well documented, research on hyperglycemia-related anxiety (HRA) is limited. HRA refers to the heightened fear that hyperglycemia-related symptoms will impair functioning.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!