Background: The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) includes multitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA) testing as a colorectal cancer (CRC) screening option in average-risk individuals, but data on colonoscopy outcomes after positive mt-sDNA tests in community settings are needed.
Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate colonoscopy outcomes and quality following positive mt-sDNA in the population-based New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.
Methods: We compared colonoscopy outcomes and quality between age-matched, sex-matched, and risk-matched patients from 30 endoscopy practices with and without a preceding positive mt-sDNA test. Main outcomes were colonoscopy findings of CRC, advanced noncancerous neoplasia, nonadvanced neoplasia, or normal examination. Quality measures included withdrawal time, bowel preparation quality, examination completion, and percentage of average-risk individuals with normal colonoscopies receiving a USPSTF-recommended 10 year rescreening interval.
Results: Individuals with positive mt-sDNA tests (N=306, average age 67.0 y; 61.8% female) were significantly more likely than colonoscopy-only patients (N=918, 66.2 y; 61.8% female) to have CRC (1.3% vs. 0.4%) or advanced noncancerous neoplasia (27.1% vs. 8.2%) (P<0.0001). Neoplasia was found in 68.0% of patients having colonoscopy after a positive mt-sDNA test, (positive predictive value, was 68.0%), versus 42.3% of patients with colonoscopy only (P<0.0001). No significant differences in colonoscopy quality measures were observed between cohorts.
Conclusions: Colonoscopy after a positive mt-sDNA test was more frequently associated with CRC and colorectal neoplasia than colonoscopy alone. Positive mt-sDNA tests can enrich the proportion of colonoscopies with clinically relevant findings. Follow-up recommendations suggest that endoscopists do not inappropriately shorten rescreening intervals in mt-sDNA-positive patients with normal colonoscopy. These findings support the clinical utility of mt-sDNA for CRC screening in community practice.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000001554 | DOI Listing |
J Gastrointest Cancer
October 2024
Digestive Disease Research Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Background: Multitarget stool DNA (MT-sDNA) tests (here, Cologuard®) are currently used in average-risk patients as a primary method of screening for colorectal cancer. However, MT-sDNA testing has also been used in patients who previously underwent colonoscopy who wish to avoid repeat colonoscopy. Here, in a large primary care practice setting, our aim was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of MT-sDNA testing in patients with a previously normal colonoscopy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHealthcare (Basel)
August 2024
Medical Analysis Expert Group, Institute of Technology, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, 16071 Cuenca, Spain.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a significant global health issue where early detection is crucial for improving treatment outcomes and survival rates. This comprehensive review assesses the utility of stool-based tests in CRC screening, including traditional fecal occult blood tests (FOBT), both chemical (gFOBT) and immunochemical techniques (FIT), as well as multitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA) as a novel and promising biomarker. The advancements, limitations and the impact of false positives and negatives of these methods are examined.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Clin Gastroenterol
August 2024
Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center.
Objective: We assessed the real-world performance of stool-based tests (SBTs) for colorectal cancer screening.
Materials And Methods: Retrospective review of average-risk individuals with positive SBT for advanced neoplasia (adenocarcinoma, advanced adenoma, and/or advanced serrated lesions) detection at follow-up colonoscopy.
Results: There was no statistical difference in the detection of advanced neoplasia (P= 0.
J Am Board Fam Med
May 2024
From the Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (ABA, SK, GC); Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University Hospital, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (JR).
Background: CRC screening is recommended for adults aged 45-75. Mt-sDNA is indicated for asymptomatic individuals between the ages of 45 and 85, but not for those with rectal bleeding, iron deficiency anemia, adenomatous polyps, previous colonoscopy within 10 years, family history of CRC, positive results from CRC screening tests within the past 6 months, or age less than 45 and greater than 85. We aimed to determine the prevalence of mt-sDNA use when not indicated and factors associated with inappropriate testing.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAm J Gastroenterol
November 2024
Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.
Introduction: Negative colonoscopies following positive stool tests could result from stool test characteristics or from the quality of endoscopist performance. We used New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry data to examine the association between endoscopist detection rates and polyp yield in colonoscopies performed for positive fecal immunochemical test (FIT) or multitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA) test to evaluate the degree to which positive stool tests followed by negative colonoscopy ("false positives") vary with endoscopist quality. In addition, we investigated the frequency of significant polyps in the subgroup of highest quality colonoscopies following positive stool tests.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!