Posterior cranial vault distraction osteogenesis in the immunocompromised patient.

Childs Nerv Syst

Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Children's of Mississippi, University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 State Street, Jackson, MS, 39216, USA.

Published: July 2021

AI Article Synopsis

  • The treatment of multisuture craniosynostosis, especially in immunosuppressed organ transplant patients, presents unique challenges but can be effectively managed with cranial distraction osteogenesis.
  • Two case studies are discussed: a 3-year-old girl post-kidney transplant who had a complicated recovery after her surgery, and a 2-year-old boy post-heart transplant who experienced a lesser degree of complications.
  • Both patients successfully expanded their cranial vaults using this procedure, and follow-up care showed no signs of elevated intracranial pressure.

Article Abstract

Purpose: The treatment of patients with multisuture craniosynostosis is complex and patient-dependent. Cranial distraction osteogenesis is a relatively new procedure for treatment of these patients, with its use increasing in many centers. With this increased use comes an expanding range of indications. Surgical management of multisuture craniosynostosis in therapeutically immunosuppressed patients following a solid organ transplant presents unique challenges. We describe our experience with posterior cranial vault distraction in two patients with multisuture craniosynostosis that had previously undergone organ transplantation.

Methods: Two solid-organ transplant recipient patients with multisuture craniosynostosis were identified. A detailed examination of their medical/transplant history and perioperative details were recorded.

Results: The first patient was a 3-year-old girl who received a kidney transplantation in infancy and subsequently presented with a symptomatic Chiari malformation and papilledema. Imaging revealed pansynostosis. She underwent posterior cranial vault distraction extending into a Chiari decompression. Her postoperative course was complicated by distractor site infection at the beginning of consolidation, necessitating early removal of distractors. The second patient was a 2-year-old boy who received a heart transplantation at the age of 3 months and subsequently presented with head shape concerns. Imaging revealed bicoronal and sagittal craniosynostosis. He underwent a posterior cranial vault distraction without complication. Following removal of the distractors, he developed an infection at one of the distractor sites with associated fever and leukocytosis, necessitating washout and drain placement. Both patients achieved successful cranial vault expansion with distraction osteogenesis and at a 2-year follow-up do not have evidence of elevated intracranial pressure.

Conclusions: Immunosuppressive therapy has the potential to inhibit wound healing and place patients at risk for wound infection. Although we have demonstrated successful cranial vault expansion with distraction in two immunosuppressed children, extra care must be taken with these patients when placing semi-buried hardware. Specifically, prompt identification and proactive management of potential infectious complications is critical to applying this technique safely in these patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00381-021-05202-yDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cranial vault
24
posterior cranial
16
vault distraction
16
multisuture craniosynostosis
16
distraction osteogenesis
12
patients multisuture
12
patients
9
treatment patients
8
subsequently presented
8
imaging revealed
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!