A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Effect of post-cam design on the kinematics and contact stress of posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. | LitMetric

Effect of post-cam design on the kinematics and contact stress of posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty.

Biomed Mater Eng

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Yonsei University, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Published: November 2021

Background: The post-cam mechanism in the posterior-stabilized (PS) implant plays an important role, such as durability and kinematic performances, in total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the difference in the kinematics and contact stress of five post-cam designs, which are flat-and-flat, curve-and-curve (concave), curve-and-curve (concave and convex), helical, and asymmetrical post-cam designs, using three-dimensional finite element models.

Methods: We designed the post-cam model with five different geometries. The kinematics, contact stress, and contact area were evaluated in the five post-cam designs under gait cycle loading conditions using the finite element method.

Results: There were no differences in the contact stress and area on the tibial insert in all designs. The largest internal rotation was shown in the swing phase for the helical design, and the largest tibial posterior translation was observed for the curve-and-curve (concave) design. The curve-and-curve (concave) design showed the lowest contact stress and the largest posterior tibial translation during the gait cycle.

Conclusions: Considering the kinematics and contact stress, we found that the curve-and-curve (concave) design was more stable than other designs. From the results, we found the important factors of TKA implant considering stability and kinematics.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/BME-201097DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

contact stress
24
curve-and-curve concave
20
kinematics contact
16
post-cam designs
12
concave design
12
total knee
8
knee arthroplasty
8
finite element
8
contact
7
post-cam
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!