Objective: Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy has been shown to be associated with poorer outcome in an influential prospective, randomized trial. However, many centers worldwide performing minimally invasive radical hysterectomy have data and experience that prove otherwise. We aim to review surgical and oncologic outcomes of patients operated by Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy in a tertiary hospital, by experienced surgeons and standardization in radicality, for cervical carcinoma Stage 1A1-1B1 from January 2009 to May 2014.
Materials & Methods: Standardised surgical technique with Parametrium & Paracolpium resection approach was adopted by qualified and experienced Gynecologic/Gyne-Oncologic Endoscopic & Minimally Invasive Surgeons in performing Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer stage 1A1-1B1 from January 2009-May 2014, involving 53 patients. Electronic Medical Record system (EMR) Of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital(Tertiary Referral Centre), Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology was accessed for surgical and oncologic outcomes.
Results: Fifty-Three patients operated from January 2009 to May 2014 were followed up for an average of 96.7 months with longest follow-up at 127 months. There were no cases of recurrence or death reported. 5 Year - Survival Rate and 5 Year Disease-Free Survival Rate were 100%. Two patients received post-operative pelvic radiation concurrent with chemotherapy using Cisplatin due to greater than 1/3 cervical stromal invasion.
Conclusion: It is vital to standardize minimally invasive surgical techniques for early stage cervical cancer, with focus on adequate radicality and resection which may contribute to excellent survival outcomes. Further international multi-center randomized trial (Minimally Invasive Therapy Versus Open Radical Hysterectomy In Cervical Cancer) will provide justification for continued practice of MIS in early stage cervical cancer.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2021.03.013 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Correspondence on "Fertility-sparing treatment with conization versus radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: inverse propensity score weighted analysis," by Ditto et al.
Int J Gynecol Cancer
January 2025
Gustave-Roussy Cancer Campus, Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Villejuif, France; University Paris Saclay, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
Objective: The Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer trial demonstrated that minimally invasive radical hysterectomy was associated with worse disease-free survival and overall survival among women with early-stage cervical cancer. It is unknown whether this applies to patients with low-risk disease following simple hysterectomy.
Methods: Among patients who underwent simple hysterectomy in the Simple Hysterectomy And PElvic node assessment trial, univariate and multivariate Cox models were used to assess the association of minimally invasive versus open surgery with clinical outcomes, including pelvic and extra-pelvic recurrence-free survival, overall recurrence-free survival, and overall survival.
Successful laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery for multiple (three) advanced recurrences of AGCT in a young woman. A case report.
Int J Surg Case Rep
January 2025
Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, SS 554, km 4,500, 09042 Monserrato, Italy.
Introduction And Importance: Debulking surgery is the main approach for recurrent adult granulosa cell tumors (AGCTs), but the effectiveness of laparoscopic extensive cytoreduction in advanced cases and its impact on quality of life (QoL) remains unclear.
Case Presentation: A 34-year-old woman, who had a right adnexectomy for AGCT in 2020, was referred with an 8-month history of a large left ovarian cyst and amenorrhea. Preoperative evaluations indicated a recurrence 18 months post-diagnosis.
A reproducible framework for monitoring the impact of randomized clinical trials on clinical practice using large-scale real-world data: application to gynaecological surgical trials using the French national healthcare database.
EClinicalMedicine
February 2025
Department of Breast and Gynaecological Surgery, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Background: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are fundamental to evidence-based medicine, but their real-world impact on clinical practice often remains unmonitored. Leveraging large-scale real-world data can enable systematic monitoring of RCT effects. We aimed to develop a reproducible framework using real-world data to assess how major RCTs influence medical practice, using two pivotal surgical RCTs in gynaecologic oncology as an example-the LACC (Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer) and LION (Lymphadenectomy in Ovarian Neoplasms) trials.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSurgical Advancements, Immunotherapy, Targeted and Conventional Therapies, Biopsy, Colposcopy, and Pap Smear Integration in the Management of Cervical Cancer.
Curr Med Chem
January 2025
Department of Pharmaceutical Quality Assurance, SVKM Institute of Pharmacy, Dhule, 424001, India.
Cervical cancer remains a significant global health concern, making it essential to investigate new treatment options continuously. This page provides an overview of the latest advancements and best practices in detection and intervention, including Pap smears, colposcopy, biopsy, immunotherapy, targeted therapies, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and surgery. Surgical techniques such as radical hysterectomy and minimally invasive procedures have advanced to enhance patient outcomes and quality of life.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!