AI Article Synopsis

  • Lefamulin, a new pleuromutilin antibiotic, proved noninferior to moxifloxacin in treating community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) in two studies (LEAP 1 and LEAP 2), demonstrating effectiveness for both intravenous and oral administration.
  • The studies involved randomized trials comparing lefamulin and moxifloxacin, focusing on early clinical responses and overall patient outcomes, with results showing high efficacy across various patient groups with common comorbidities associated with CABP.
  • Both drugs exhibited similar success rates and no new safety concerns were reported, indicating that lefamulin is a promising treatment option for CABP.

Article Abstract

Background: Lefamulin, a first-in-class pleuromutilin antibiotic approved for intravenous and oral use in adults with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP), was noninferior to moxifloxacin in the Lefamulin Evaluation Against Pneumonia (LEAP) 1 intravenous-to-oral switch study and the LEAP 2 oral-only study. Using pooled LEAP 1/2 data, we examined lefamulin efficacy/safety overall and within subgroups of patients presenting with comorbidities typical in CABP management.

Methods: In LEAP 1, adults with CABP were randomized to receive intravenous lefamulin (150 mg every 12 h) for 5‒7 days or moxifloxacin (400 mg every 24 h) for 7 days, with optional intravenous-to-oral switch if predefined improvement criteria were met. In LEAP 2, adults with CABP were randomized to receive oral lefamulin (600 mg every 12 h) for 5 days or moxifloxacin (400 mg every 24 h) for 7 days. Both studies assessed early clinical response (ECR) at 96 ± 24 h after first study drug dose and investigator assessment of clinical response (IACR) at test-of-cure (5‒10 days after last dose). Pooled analyses of the overall population used a 10% noninferiority margin.

Results: Lefamulin (n = 646) was noninferior to moxifloxacin (n = 643) for ECR (89.3% vs 90.5%, respectively; difference  - 1.1%; 95% CI  - 4.4 to 2.2); IACR success rates at test-of-cure were similarly high (≥ 85.0%). High efficacy with both lefamulin and moxifloxacin was also demonstrated across all well-represented patient subgroups, including those with advanced age, diabetes mellitus, a history of cardiovascular diseases (e.g., hypertension, congestive heart failure, or arrhythmia) or chronic lung diseases (e.g., asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), elevated liver enzymes, or mild-to-moderate renal dysfunction. No new safety signals were identified.

Conclusions: Lefamulin may provide a valuable intravenous/oral monotherapy alternative to fluoroquinolones or macrolides for empiric treatment of patients with CABP, including cases of patients at risk for poor outcomes due to age or various comorbidities.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov LEAP 1 (NCT02559310; Registration Date: 24/09/2015) and LEAP 2 (NCT02813694; Registration Date: 27/06/2016).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8105923PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-021-01472-zDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lefamulin
9
community-acquired bacterial
8
bacterial pneumonia
8
noninferior moxifloxacin
8
intravenous-to-oral switch
8
leap adults
8
adults cabp
8
cabp randomized
8
randomized receive
8
moxifloxacin 400 mg
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!