Diagnostic accuracy of rapid nucleic acid tests for group A streptococcal pharyngitis: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Clin Microbiol Infect

Université de Paris, Centre of Research in Epidemiology and Statistics (CRESS), INSERM, Paris, France; Necker-Enfants malades Hospital, APHP, Université de Paris, Department of General Paediatrics and Paediatric Infectious Diseases, Paris, France. Electronic address:

Published: December 2021

Background: Acute pharyngitis is one of the most common conditions in outpatient settings and an important source of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing. Rapid antigen detection tests (RADTs) offer diagnosis of group A streptococcus at the point of care but have limited sensitivity. Rapid nucleic acid tests (RNATs) are now available; a systematic review of their accuracy is lacking.

Objectives: To evaluate the accuracy of RNATs in patients with pharyngitis; to explore test-level and study-level factors that could explain variability in accuracy; and to compare the accuracy of RNATs with that of RADTs.

Data Sources: MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science (1990-2020).

Study Eligibility Criteria: Cross-sectional studies and randomized trials.

Participants: Patients with pharyngitis.

Index Test/s And Reference Standards: RNAT commercial kits compared with throat culture.

Methods: We assessed risk of bias and applicability using QUADAS-2. We performed meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity using the bivariate random-effects model. Variability was explored by subgroup analyses and meta-regression.

Results: We included 38 studies (46 test evaluations; 17 411 test results). RNATs were most often performed in a laboratory. The overall methodological quality of primary studies was uncertain because of incomplete reporting. RNATs had a summary sensitivity of 97.5% (95% CI 96.2%-98.3%) and a summary specificity of 95.1% (95% CI 93.6%-96.3%). There was low variability in estimates across studies. Variability in sensitivity and specificity was partially explained by test type (p < 0.05 for both). Sensitivity analyses limited to studies with low risk of bias showed robust accuracy estimates. RNATs were more sensitive than RADTs (13 studies; 96.8% versus 82.3%, p 0.004); there was no difference in specificity (p 0.92).

Conclusions: The high diagnostic accuracy of RNATs may allow their use as stand-alone tests to diagnose group A streptococcus pharyngitis. Based on direct comparisons, RNATs have greater sensitivity than RADTs and equal specificity. Further studies should evaluate RNATs in point-of-care settings.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2021.04.021DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rapid nucleic
8
nucleic acid
8
acid tests
8
systematic review
8
accuracy rnats
8
sensitivity specificity
8
rnats
5
diagnostic accuracy
4
accuracy rapid
4
tests group
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!