Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Objective: To evaluate the performance of a rapidly responsive adaptive algorithm (VDL1.1) for automated oxygen control in preterm infants with respiratory insufficiency.
Design: Interventional cross-over study of a 24-hour period of automated oxygen control compared with aggregated data from two flanking periods of manual control (12 hours each).
Setting: Neonatal intensive care unit.
Participants: Preterm infants receiving non-invasive respiratory support and supplemental oxygen; median birth gestation 27 weeks (IQR 26-28) and postnatal age 17 (12-23) days.
Intervention: Automated oxygen titration with the VDL1.1 algorithm, with the incoming SpO signal derived from a standard oximetry probe, and the computed inspired oxygen concentration (FiO) adjustments actuated by a motorised blender. The desired SpO range was 90%-94%, with bedside clinicians able to make corrective manual FiO adjustments at all times.
Main Outcome Measures: Target range (TR) time (SpO 90%-94% or 90%-100% if in air), periods of SpO deviation, number of manual FiO adjustments and oxygen requirement were compared between automated and manual control periods.
Results: In 60 cross-over studies in 35 infants, automated oxygen titration resulted in greater TR time (manual 58 (51-64)% vs automated 81 (72-85)%, p<0.001), less time at both extremes of oxygenation and considerably fewer prolonged hypoxaemic and hyperoxaemic episodes. The algorithm functioned effectively in every infant. Manual FiO adjustments were infrequent during automated control (0.11 adjustments/hour), and oxygen requirements were similar (manual 28 (25-32)% and automated 26 (24-32)%, p=0.13).
Conclusion: The VDL1.1 algorithm was safe and effective in SpO targeting in preterm infants on non-invasive respiratory support.
Trial Registration Number: ACTRN12616000300471.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2020-321538 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!