AI Article Synopsis

  • The COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted dental practices globally, with a high risk of cross-infection for both dentists and patients due to the nature of dental settings.
  • Most participating dentists (75.9%) reported that their practices were closed during the first wave of the pandemic, with private sector closures more common than those in the non-private sector.
  • Factors influencing closures included heightened pandemic fears and sector type, with rural non-private dentists and those in hospitals reporting lower closure likelihood, while academic dentists had a higher likelihood of closing their practices.

Article Abstract

Background: The coronavirus outbreak (COVID-19) in China has influenced every aspect of life worldwide. Given the unique characteristics of the dental setting, the risk of cross-infection between dental practitioners and patients is high in the absence of adequate protective measures, and dentists may develop severe anxiety in relation to the current pandemic. The limited provision of services and widespread closure of dental practices have raised concerns among dental professionals about the financial impact. The present study assessed the frequency of dental practice closure during the pandemic's first wave in several countries and whether closures and their associated factors differ between the private and non-private sectors.

Methods: An electronic cross-sectional survey questionnaire was sent to dentists in several countries, from April to May 2020. The survey assessed professional, practice related and country-level structural factors elucidating the reason for practice closure. Multilevel logistic regression was used to assess the association between practice closure and these factors, and differences were evaluated by sector type.

Results: Dentists from 29 countries (n = 3243) participated in this study. Most of the participants (75.9%) reported practice closure with significantly higher percentage in the private sector than the non-private sector. Greater pandemic-related fears were associated with a significantly higher likelihood of practice closure in the private (odds ratio [OR] = 1.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.24, 1.92) and non-private (OR = 1.38, 95% CI 1.04, 1.82) sectors. Dentists in non-private rural areas (OR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.42, 0.81), and those in hospitals (overall OR = 0.60, 95% CI 0.36, 0.99) reported a low likelihood of closure. A high likelihood of closure was reported by dentists in the academia (OR = 2.13, 95% CI 1.23, 3.71). More hospital beds at the country-level were associated with a lower likelihood of closure in the non-private sector (OR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.46, 0.91). Private- sector dentists in high- income countries (HICs) reported fewer closures than those in non-HICs (OR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.15, 1.93).

Conclusions: Most dentists reported practice closure because of COVID-19, and greater impacts were reported in the private sector than in the non-private sector. Closure was associated with professional, practice, and country-levels factors.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8102846PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01601-4DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

practice closure
28
closure
12
professional practice
12
non-private sector
12
likelihood closure
12
practice
9
dental practice
8
associated professional
8
dentists countries
8
reported practice
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!