AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates how contralateral white noise masking affects the amplitude and latency of the V wave during auditory brainstem response (ABR) testing in adults with normal hearing.
  • The research aims to determine if contralateral masking is necessary during ABR measurements and explores its potential use in patients with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss.
  • The findings indicate no significant changes in V wave characteristics with increasing white noise levels in normal hearing individuals, while cross-hearing was noted in those with unilateral hearing loss.

Article Abstract

Background: Contralateral noise masking is an important aspect of auditory brainstem response (ABR) measurements.

Purpose: The primary aim of this study is to determine how contralateral white noise (WN) masking influences the amplitude and the latency of V wave generated during ABR measurements, using tone burst (TB), in adult ears with normal hearing (NH). The secondary aim of this study is to ascertain the need of contralateral masking in ABR measurements with the TB stimuli using a 3A insertion earphone, and to propose the applicability of WN masking in unilateral sensorineural hearing loss (USNHL).

Research Design: It is a cross-sectional observational and descriptive study.

Study Sample: Experiment 1: Thirty individuals, without any otologic, psychological, or neurological dysfunction, were selected. Experiment 2: Fifteen individuals with previous audiological diagnoses of severe and profound USNHL were considered.

Intervention: The study involves ABR TB at specific frequencies of 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz.

Data Collection And Analysis: Experiment 1: The evaluation was performed at the fixed intensity of 80 dB nHL (decibel normalized hearing level) on the tested ear, followed by the application of simultaneous masking to the nontested ear, intensity ranged from 0 to 80 dB. Experiment 2: ABR threshold measurements were first performed on the ear with hearing loss (HL) at the frequencies of 1, 2, and 4 kHz. The results were subsequently confirmed using contralateral masking.

Results: Experiment 1: At any given frequency, there were no statistically significant differences in the amplitude and latency of V wave with increase in the intensities of WN masking. Experiment 2: Cross-hearing was observed at least once in all frequencies analyzed through the occurrence of V wave.

Conclusion: In conclusion, the contralateral WN masking at the maximum intensity of 80 dB does not affect the amplitude and latency of V wave of the ABR TB at 1, 2, and 4 kHz. Contralateral masking for the ABR TB presented using 3A insertion earphones is necessary at 1, 2, and 4 kHz in individuals with severe or profound degrees of USNHL and at intensities of 15, 20, and 10 dB above the ABR threshold of the nontested ear.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1722985DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

contralateral masking
16
hearing loss
12
amplitude latency
12
latency wave
12
auditory brainstem
8
tone burst
8
masking
8
noise masking
8
abr
8
aim study
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!