A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Week to week variability of pulmonary capillary blood volume and alveolar membrane diffusing capacity in patients with heart failure. | LitMetric

Week to week variability of pulmonary capillary blood volume and alveolar membrane diffusing capacity in patients with heart failure.

Respir Physiol Neurobiol

Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milano, Italy; Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Cardiovascular Section, University of Milano, Milano, Italy. Electronic address:

Published: August 2021

Background: Alveolar-capillary membrane diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DMCO) and pulmonary capillary volume (Vcap) can be estimated by the multi-step Roughton and Foster (RF, original method from 1957) or the single-step NO-CO double diffusion technique (developed in the 1980s). The latter method implies inherent assumptions. We sought to determine which combination of the alveolar membrane diffusing capacity for nitric oxide (DMNO) to DMCO ratio, an specific conductance of the blood for NO (θ) and CO (θ) gave the lowest week-to-week variability in patients with heart failure.

Methods: 44 heart failure patients underwent DMCO and Vcap measurements on three occasions over a ten-week period using both RF and double dilution NO-CO techniques.

Results: When using the double diffusing method and applying θ = infinity, the smallest week-to-week coefficient of variation for DMCO was 10 %. Conversely, the RF method derived DMCO had a much greater week-to-week variability (2x higher coefficient of variation) than the DMCO derived via the NO-CO double dilution technique. The DMCO derived from the double diffusion technique most closely matched the DMCO from the RF method when θ = infinity and DMCO = DLNO/2.42. The Vcap measured week-to-week was unreliable regardless of the method or constants used.

Conclusions: In heart failure patients, the week-to-week DMCO variability was lowest when using the single-step NO-CO technique. DMCO obtained from double diffusion most closely matched the RF DMCO when DMCO/2.42 and θ = infinity. Vcap estimation was unreliable with either method.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resp.2021.103679DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

membrane diffusing
12
diffusing capacity
12
heart failure
12
double diffusion
12
dmco
11
pulmonary capillary
8
alveolar membrane
8
patients heart
8
single-step no-co
8
no-co double
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!