Study Objective: To compare residents' perceptions of readiness to perform robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy with the perceptions of residency program directors in obstetrics and gynecology programs throughout the United States.
Design: A survey was administered to all residents taking the 2019 Council on Resident Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology Exam and concurrently to program directors in all Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited training programs.
Setting: The survey was designed to assess resident confidence to perform robotic hysterectomies by the time of graduation.
Patients: No patients were included in the study.
Interventions: The only intervention was administration of the survey.
Measurements And Main Results: De-identified survey data were analyzed using chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests. A total of 5473 resident respondents and 241 residency program directors were included in the study. Fifty-two percent of graduating residents reported that they felt they were given surgical autonomy to perform robotic hysterectomies, and 53.7% reported that they could perform one independently (if it was an "emergency" and they had to). By the time of graduation, only 59% of residents reported confidence performing a robotic hysterectomy, and only 56% reported they felt that it would be an important procedure for their future career. Program directors were significantly more likely to report that their residents were given autonomy to perform robotic hysterectomy by graduation (61.0% [95% confidence interval (CI), 54.3-67.3]), could perform a robotic hysterectomy independently (60.9% [95% CI, 53.9-67.6]), or could perform a robotic hysterectomy by graduation (70.2% [95% CI, 63.5-76.3]) than residents themselves (38.6% [95% CI, 37.2-40.0], 22.8% [95% CI, 21.6-24.0], 62.6% [95% CI, 61.2-64.0], respectively).
Conclusion: At the time of graduation, residents' confidence in performing robotic hysterectomy independently is lower than their confidence in performing all other approaches to hysterectomy.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2021.04.019 | DOI Listing |
Diagnostics (Basel)
December 2024
Center for Advanced Research in Cardiovascular Pathology and Hemostaseology, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.
Background/objectives: This systematic review aimed to evaluate the outcomes of minimally invasive techniques in gynecological cancer surgery, specifically laparoscopic hysterectomies (LHs), robotic-assisted hysterectomies (RHs), and laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomies (LAVHs).
Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of electronic databases including PubMed and MedLine from January 2010 to August 2024. The search included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies.
Cancers (Basel)
December 2024
Division of Gynaecologic Oncologic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Skåne University Hospital Lund, 22185 Lund, Sweden.
Background/objectives: Given the risk of a progression, or an undiagnosed endometrial cancer (EC), the treatment of choice is hysterectomy in women with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN). The risk of metastatic disease and whether sentinel node (SLN) biopsy should be performed remains unclear. The primary aim of this prospective study was to determine the overall incidence of concurrent EC and the impact of the diagnostic tool used and the type of endometrial lesion.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFGynecol Oncol
January 2025
Division of Gynecologic Oncology, St. Luke's University Health Network, Bethlehem, PA, United States of America.
Objective: We sought to determine the cost-effectiveness (CE) of lymph node dissection (LND) at the time of hysterectomy for endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN).
Methods: A decision analytic model was created to evaluate the strategies of routine full LND, sentinel lymph node dissection (SNLD), SNLD without advancing to full LND in the event of non-mapping, and full LND based on Mayo Criteria, versus no LND. Patients in the no LND group and those in the SLND group without advancement to full LND in the event of non-mapping who were found to have EC on final pathology and suspicious post-operative imaging underwent full LND.
Cureus
December 2024
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Zydus Hospitals, Ahmedabad, IND.
Background In gynecology, hysterectomy is a common surgical procedure for benign conditions. This study was conducted to assess the short-term clinical outcomes of robotic-assisted hysterectomy in the Indian population. Methods We performed a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent robotic-assisted benign hysterectomy procedures between December 2021 and July 2024.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur J Surg Oncol
December 2024
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 'Filippo Del Ponte' Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
Objective: To assess the safety and long-term effectiveness of minimally invasive approach in managing "oldest old" endometrial cancer patients.
Methods: This is a retrospective cohort, multi-institutional study. Consecutive patients, treated between 2000 and 2020, with apparent early-stage endometrial cancer patients, aged ≥85 years.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!