A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Positron emission tomography complete metabolic response as a favorable prognostic predictor in esophageal cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel/cisplatin/5-fluorouracil. | LitMetric

Background: F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography is useful in diagnosing lymph node and distant metastases of esophageal cancer. However, its value for predicting survival is controversial.

Aim: To evaluate the value of PET complete metabolic response (CMR) as a prognostic predictor for esophageal cancer.

Methods: Between June 2013 and December 2017, 58 patients with squamous cell esophageal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in Oita University were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. Tumors were clinically staged using fluorodeoxyglucose-PET/computed tomography before and after NAC. After NAC, maximal standardized uptake value ≤ 2.5 was defined as PET-CMR, and maximal standardized uptake value > 2.5 was defined as non-PET-CMR. We compared short-term outcomes between the PET-CMR group and non-PET-CMR group and evaluated prognostic factors by univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results: The PET-CMR group included 22 patients, and the non-PET-CMR group included 36 patients. There were no significant differences in intraoperative and postoperative complications between the two groups. Five-year relapse-free survival and overall survival in the PET-CMR group were significantly more favorable than those in the non-PET-CMR group (38.6 mo 20.8 mo, = 0.021; 42.8 mo 25.1 mo, = 0.011, respectively). PET-CMR was a significant prognostic factor in terms of relapse-free survival by univariate analysis (hazard ratio: 2.523; 95% confidence interval: 1.034-7.063; < 0.041). Particularly, PET-computed tomography negative N was an independent prognostic factor of relapse-free survival and overall survival by multivariate analysis.

Conclusion: PET-CMR after NAC is considered a favorable prognostic factor for esophageal cancer. Evaluation by PET-computed tomography could be useful in clinical decision making for esophageal cancer.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8085515PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v12.i4.249DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

esophageal cancer
20
pet-cmr group
12
non-pet-cmr group
12
relapse-free survival
12
prognostic factor
12
emission tomography
8
complete metabolic
8
metabolic response
8
favorable prognostic
8
prognostic predictor
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!