Aim: Whether the use of dinoprostone pessary increased the vaginal delivery rate of labor induction in Chinese nulliparous women with term premature rupture of membranes (PROM) and unfavorable cervices?

Methods: PROM women at term with singleton pregnancies and Bishop scores ≤4 who needed labor induction were enrolled in this retrospective study. They received either the dinoprostone pessary followed by oxytocin infusion if necessary (n = 102, PGE2 group) or oxytocin infusion alone (n = 103, oxytocin group).

Results: Compared with oxytocin infusion alone, vaginal delivery within 12 h and total vaginal delivery were higher in the PGE2 group (28.4% vs 7.8%, p = 0.0001; 79.4% vs 62.1%, p = 0.009, respectively). There were no statistical differences between the two groups in terms of maternal and neonatal outcomes, such as postpartum hemorrhage, endometritis, third- and fourth-degree vaginal lacerations and neonatal weight, 1- and 5-min Apgar score ≤7, neonatal jaundice, and neonatal unit admission (p > 0.05). However, there was a higher rate of uterine hyperstimulation in the PGE2 group (20.6% vs 3.9%, p < 0.0001). The effective rate of cervical ripening increased in the PGE2 group at 8 and 12 h of labor induction (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Despite higher rates of uterine hyperstimulation, the use of dinoprostone was associated with higher rates of vaginal deliveries in Chinese nulliparous women with term PROM and Bishop scores ≤4, compared with use of oxytocin only.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jog.14749DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

dinoprostone pessary
12
labor induction
12
vaginal delivery
12
oxytocin infusion
12
pge2 group
12
induction chinese
8
premature rupture
8
rupture membranes
8
women term
8
pessary labor
4

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • - Labor induction in France often involves using intravaginal dinoprostone (Propess®), but there's debate on whether to repeat this or switch to oxytocin if labor doesn’t start within 24 hours.
  • - The study aimed to compare the effectiveness of a second Propess® placement followed by oxytocin versus direct oxytocin in increasing vaginal delivery rates among pregnant women who didn’t respond to the first Propess®.
  • - Results showed no significant difference in vaginal delivery rates between the two methods (76.3% for the second Propess® vs. 73.8% for oxytocin), but more cesarean sections occurred in the Propess® group due to dilation issues.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Vaginal pH has been suggested to be one of the causative factors, responsible for variation in prostaglandin efficacy for induction of labour. The purpose of this study was to analyse the effect of vaginal douching with normal saline before insertion of dinoprostone vaginal insert for induction of labour.

Methods: This randomised controlled study was done in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology for a period of 1 year.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Comparison of cesarean delivery rates after 3 methods of cervical ripening among obese women at or after 41 weeks - Secondary analysis of two French randomized controlled trials: MAGPOP and CYTOPRO.

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol

December 2023

CERPOP, UMR 1295, Team SPHERE (Study of Perinatal, Pediatric and Adolescent Health: Epidemiological Research and Evaluation) Toulouse III University, Toulouse, France; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Paule de Viguier Hospital, Toulouse III University, Toulouse, France.

Article Synopsis
  • The study aimed to compare the cesarean rates and maternal and neonatal complications among obese pregnant women who needed cervical ripening for labor induction at or after 41 weeks gestation.
  • The analysis involved 336 overweight women and examined the effectiveness of various cervical ripening methods: PGE2 pessary, low-dose vaginal PGE1, and double-balloon catheter.
  • Results showed no significant difference in cesarean rates between methods, but the PGE2 pessary was associated with fewer perineal tears compared to PGE1, indicating a need for further research on the best methods for this group.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Safety of misoprostol vs dinoprostone for induction of labor: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol

October 2023

Maternal and Child Department, Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, S. Anna University Hospital, Cona, Ferrara, Italy; Department of Medical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.

Objective: Pharmacological agents such as prostaglandins (dinoprostone and misoprostol) are commonly used to reduce the duration of labor and promote vaginal delivery. However, key safety considerations with its use include an increased risk of uterine rupture, tachysystole and hyperstimulation of pregnant women, which could potentially lead to a non-reassuring fetal heart rate and to fetal hypoxemia. The aim of this systematic review was to assess maternal and fetal outcomes between misoprostol group (PGE1) and dinoprostone group (PGE2) STUDY DESIGN: We search on MEDLINE (PubMed), CINHAL (EBSCOhost), EMBASE, Scopus (Ovid), CENTRAL (January 1, 1998, to December 31, 2022).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aims and Objectives To compare the safety and efficacy of dinoprostone pessary with Foley plus vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening. Materials and Methods We randomized 115 women to the pessary or Foley plus misoprostol group. Pessary was inserted for 24 hours, and in the Foley plus misoprostol group, intravaginal misoprostol 25 mcg was administered along with trans-cervical Foley insertion and repeated every six hours to a maximum dose of 100 mcg.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!