Background: No systematic review and meta-analysis of dento-skeletal effects following rapid maxillary expansion (RME) and slow maxillary expansion (SME) using the same jackscrew expander with different activation protocols is available.
Objective: To compare dento-skeletal effects produced by RME with those induced by SME using the same fixed jackscrew expanders in growing patients.
Search Methods: PubMed (MEDLINE), Cochrane Library, Scopus, Embase, and OpenGrey were searched with no language or publication date restrictions.
Selection Criteria: Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were selected and the following inclusion criteria were used: growing patients in mixed or permanent dentition, with maxillary transverse discrepancy, dental crowding, and treated with fixed jackscrew maxillary expander (e.g. Hyrax, Haas) activated to achieve either RME or SME.
Data Collection And Analysis: Data were extracted by two independent reviewers. The quality of the included RCTs was assessed according to the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2.0). For the aggregation of continuous data, the mean of the differences (MD) between treatments was used. A random effect model was applied.
Results: From 4855 retrieved articles, 3 studies were selected, 1 at unclear risk and 2 at high risk of bias. Maxillary intermolar distance showed no significant differences between the two modalities of expansion [pooled MD = 0.99 mm favouring RME, with 95% confidence interval (CI) = -2.09 to 4.06, P = 0.53, I2 = 90%]. As for maxillary molar inclination measured as the angle formed by the axes passing through the disto-buccal cusps and the apexes of the palatine root of the first upper molars, it was significantly smaller in the SME group (MD = -11.51°, with 95% CI = -15.23 to -7.79, P < 0.0001). Posterior maxillary expansion was significantly greater in RME than SME (pooled MD = 0.75 mm, with 95% CI = 0.27-1.23, P = 0.002, I2 = 0%).
Conclusions: Both RME and SME produce an effective dento-skeletal expansion of the maxilla. RME is slightly more effective in increasing the posterior transverse skeletal width of the maxilla while SME induces smaller molar inclination.
Registration: PROSPERO CDR42018105530.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjaa086 | DOI Listing |
Clin Adv Periodontics
January 2025
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Eastman Institute for Oral Health, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA.
Background: Gingival recession defects (GRDs) pose functional and esthetic concerns and may be associated with unfavorable tooth positions. Surgically facilitated orthodontic treatment (SFOT) with clear aligners can be a valuable option for adults with severe malocclusion and GRDs.
Methods: A 28-year-old male presented with severe dental crowding, Class III dental malocclusion, localized tooth crossbites, and tapered maxillary arch.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J
January 2025
Division of Orthodontics, Hospital for Rehabilitation of Craniofacial Anomalies, University of São Paulo, Bauru, Brazil.
This case report presents the multidisciplinary treatment of a male patient with a complex form of frontonasal dysplasia who presented with a 0 to 14 facial cleft, mild hypertelorism, absence of the nasal medial process of the nose, and frontonasal encephalocele. Cranial and plastic surgeries were performed to correct hypertelorism and improve the esthetic appearance of the frontonasal region. In the permanent dentition, the patient presented a Class II, division 1 malocclusion with severe maxillary constriction and bilateral posterior crossbite.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHead Neck Pathol
January 2025
Department of Oral Surgery and Pathology, School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Introduction: Segmental Odontomaxillary Dysplasia (SOD) is a non-hereditary, unilateral developmental anomaly recently included in the WHO's classification of head and neck tumors.
Case Presentation: Here, we report the case of an 8-year-old boy presenting with unilateral maxillary enlargement and pain without facial asymmetry. Computed tomography revealed a hypodense area in the maxillary bone with altered bone structure and osseous expansion.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
January 2025
Department of Orthodontics, Gulhane Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.
Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the stability of palatal rugae patterns after slow maxillary expansion (SME) treatment and the reliability of the rugae region as a reference region in digital superimposition.
Methods: The SME group comprised 21 subjects with Angle Class I or Class II dental malocclusion with unilateral or bilateral crossbite and constricted maxilla and were selected before the pubertal peak. Intraoral scans were captured via the intraoral scanner iTero Element software (version 1.
Eur J Orthod
December 2024
Department of General Surgery and Medical-Surgical Specialties, Section of Orthodontics, University of Catania, Policlinico Universitario 'Gaspare Rodolico-San Marco', Via Santa Sofia 78, 95123, Catania, Italy.
Background/objectives: Evidence suggests nasal airflow resistance reduces after rapid maxillary expansion (RME). However, the medium-term effects of RME on upper airway (UA) airflow characteristics when normal craniofacial development is considered are still unclear. This retrospective cohort study used computer fluid dynamics (CFD) to evaluate the medium-term changes in the UA airflow (pressure and velocity) after RME in two distinct age-based cohorts.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!