Experience of cardiac implantable electronic device lead removal from a South African tertiary referral centre.

Cardiovasc J Afr

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town; Cardiac Clinic, Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.

Published: January 2022

Background: The rate of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation in low- and middle-income countries is increasing. Patients recieving these devices are frequently older and with multiple co-morbidities, which may later lead to complications requiring CIED removal. CIED removals are associated with life-threatening complications. However, high sucesss rates are reported in high-income countries. The purpose of this study was to report on the experience of CIED removal in a resource-constrained setting.

Methods: In this retrospective study, we included consecutive adult patients admitted to Groote Schuur Hospital and the University of Cape Town Private Academic Hospital for CIED removal from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2019.

Results: During the study period, 53 patients underwent CIED removal (26 extractions and 27 explants). The patients had a mean (standard deviation) age of 59.1 (16.0) years. A history of systemic hypertension was present in 50.9% of patients, diabetes mellitus in 30.2% and dilated cardiomyopathy in 47.2%. Complete heart block was the leading indication for CIED implantation (37.7%), and device infection was the leading indication for removal (69.2%). CIEDs were removed after a median (interquantile range) of 243 (53-831) days. There were 40 leads extracted and 35 explants. Lead extractions were perfomed in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory under general anaesthesia via a percutaneous transvenous superior approach. There was one major and one minor complication related to lead extraction.

Conclusions: CIED infections were the primary indication for CIED removal in a tertiary referral centre in South Africa. Despite being a low-volume centre, we report a high percutaneous transvenous extraction success rate with low complication rate; results which are comparable to high-volume centres.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8756057PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.5830/CVJA-2021-010DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cied removal
20
cied
9
cardiac implantable
8
implantable electronic
8
electronic device
8
tertiary referral
8
referral centre
8
cied implantation
8
leading indication
8
indication cied
8

Similar Publications

This case details the successful implantation of a leadless pacemaker following the extraction of transvenous leads in a 72-year-old female patient with a complex cardiovascular history. The patient had undergone a series of cardiac interventions, including a recent percutaneous tricuspid valve repair with a metal clip implant due to severe regurgitation. After presenting with an infection at the pacemaker site, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus hominis was identified, necessitating the removal of the entire pacing system.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Removal of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is strongly recommended for CIED-related infections, and leadless pacemakers (LPs) are increasingly used for reimplantation. However, the optimal timing and safety of LP implantation after CIED removal for infection remains unclear.This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess complication rates (all-cause mortality and reinfection) when LP implantation was performed simultaneously with or after CIED removal.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), including pacemakers, implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICD), and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices, regulate heart rate and rhythm in patients with cardiac conditions. With an aging population, CIED-related complications, especially pacemaker pocket infections, are rising. Risk factors include frailty, older age, and superficial device fixation, while risk mitigation involves larger pocket sizes, submuscular fixation, and absorbable antibacterial envelopes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Delayed lead perforation is a rare complication of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED). Clinical presentations range from completely asymptomatic to pericardial tamponade. Surgical lead extraction is recommended and transvenous lead extraction (TLE) with surgical backup is an alternative method.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aims: Utilization of transvenous lead extraction/removal (TLE) for the management of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED)-associated infective endocarditis (IE) remains low. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of hospital TLE procedural volume on TLE utilization and outcomes for patients with CIED-associated IE.

Methods And Results: Using the Nationwide Readmissions Database, we evaluated 21 545 admissions for patients (mean age 70 years, 39% female) with CIEDs hospitalized with IE at TLE centres.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!