Similar pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a new biosimilar and reference insulin aspart in healthy Chinese males.

Sci Rep

Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No.37 Guoxue Alley, Wuhou District, Chengdu City, Sichuan Province, People's Republic of China.

Published: May 2021

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study compared the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of two rapid-acting insulin products: a new biosimilar (RD10046) and NovoRapid, aimed at controlling post-meal blood glucose levels.
  • Participants were healthy Chinese males who received both insulin products in a crossover trial, completing all treatment periods without any adverse events like hypoglycemia or allergic reactions.
  • Results showed that PK and PD measures were similar for both products, indicating that RD10046 is bioequivalent to NovoRapid, as the 90% confidence intervals met the acceptance criteria.

Article Abstract

Insulin aspart (IAsp) is one of the main therapies used to control blood glucose after a meal. This study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of 2 rapid-acting IAsp products: a new IAsp biosimilar (RD10046) and NovoRapid. In a single-center, randomized, single-dose, 2-period, crossover, euglycemic clamp study (registry number: CTR20180517, registration date: 2018-05-30), healthy Chinese males were randomized to receive 0.2 U/kg of the IAsp biosimilar RD10046 and NovoRapid under fasted conditions on two separate occasions. PK and PD were assessed for up to 10 h. Of the 30 randomized subjects, all 30 completed both treatment periods. The PK (area under the curve [AUC] of total IAsp; maximum observed IAsp concentration [C]) and PD (maximum glucose infusion rate [GIR]; total glucose infusion during the clamp [AUC]) were similar between the new IAsp biosimilar RD10046 and NovoRapid. In all cases, the 90% CIs for the ratios of the geometric means were completely contained in the prespecified acceptance limits of 0.80-1.25. No hypoglycemic events, allergic reactions, or local injection adverse reactions occurred in this trial. We concluded that the studied IAsp biosimilar (RD10046) was bioequivalent to NovoRapid.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8096952PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88782-8DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

iasp biosimilar
16
biosimilar rd10046
16
rd10046 novorapid
12
pharmacokinetics pharmacodynamics
8
insulin aspart
8
healthy chinese
8
chinese males
8
iasp
8
glucose infusion
8
biosimilar
5

Similar Publications

Similar pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a new biosimilar and reference insulin aspart in healthy Chinese males.

Sci Rep

May 2021

Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No.37 Guoxue Alley, Wuhou District, Chengdu City, Sichuan Province, People's Republic of China.

Article Synopsis
  • The study compared the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of two rapid-acting insulin products: a new biosimilar (RD10046) and NovoRapid, aimed at controlling post-meal blood glucose levels.
  • Participants were healthy Chinese males who received both insulin products in a crossover trial, completing all treatment periods without any adverse events like hypoglycemia or allergic reactions.
  • Results showed that PK and PD measures were similar for both products, indicating that RD10046 is bioequivalent to NovoRapid, as the 90% confidence intervals met the acceptance criteria.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!