A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Earfold™: A combined approach with conchal bowl reduction. | LitMetric

Earfold™: A combined approach with conchal bowl reduction.

J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg

Department of Plastic Surgery, Royal Free Hospital, Pond St., NW3 2QG London, United Kingdom. Electronic address:

Published: October 2021

Background: Prominent ear deformity is common amongst the human population and is partly due to underdevelopment of the antihelical fold, a prominent conchal bowl, or both. Recently, the senior author described a minimally invasive technique for changing the shape of the antihelical fold using the Earfold™ implant (Allergan plc, Dublin, Ireland). However, there is still a paucity of data regarding outcomes from combing this approach with surgical techniques to correct conchal bowl hypertrophy.

Objectives And Methods: Questionnaire-based study evaluating outcomes in consecutive patients undergoing treatment with Earfold™ and conchal bowl reduction. Patient reported outcome measures were assessed with a validated questionnaire. Data on complications were obtained from the patient's case notes and free-text sections of the questionnaire.

Results: Completed questionnaires were received from 8 patients out of a total of 18 who underwent the combination treatment (44% response rate). Statistically significant differences were noted in nearly all questions (18/19) relating to changes in ear appearance as a result of the surgery, with all patients being satisfied following the combined procedure. Improvements in subjective outcomes were compared to previous studies evaluating treatment with Earfold™.

Conclusions: The Earfold™ implant can be combined safely with other otoplasty techniques to achieve a good outcome in a carefully selected patient population.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2021.03.113DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

conchal bowl
16
bowl reduction
8
antihelical fold
8
earfold™ implant
8
earfold™
4
earfold™ combined
4
combined approach
4
conchal
4
approach conchal
4
bowl
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!