Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Aim And Objectives: To evaluate the effect of patient-centred self-management programme on mental health, self-efficacy and self-management of patients with hypertensive nephropathy.
Background: If the symptoms of hypertension are not well-controlled, deterioration of renal function will accelerate and evolve into hypertensive nephropathy.
Design: A randomised single-blind trial. This article follows the requirements of CONSORT statement.
Methods: The experimental group (n = 35) after pre-test used patient-centred self-management programme once a week for a total of 4 weeks and the intervention effect was measured after 3 months for post-test. Contrarily, the traditional care was employed for the control group (n = 35). The measuring outcomes included mental health, self-efficacy and self-management. Trial registry is listed under https://clinicaltrials.gov/ with Identifier No. NCT04633993.
Results: After the intervention, the average score of mental health for the experimental group was 20.79 (SD = 0.82) which was higher than the 19.27 points for the control group (SD = 0.77) and showed a significant difference (F = 8.31, p = .005, partial eta = 0.133). In terms of self-efficacy, the average score for the experimental group was 214.13 (SD = 6.40), which was higher than the 189.58 points for the control group (SD = 6.03) and exhibited a significant difference (F = 11.82, p = .001, partial eta = 0.197). Regarding self-management, the average score of the experimental group was 75.12 (SD = 2.29) which was significantly higher than the 68.80 points of the control group (SD = 2.43) (F = 11.17, p = .001, partial eta = 0.190).
Conclusions: In addition to promoting mental health of individual cases, this intervention also increases their self-confidence in disease control and improves their self-management on diseases.
Relevance To Clinical Practice: The intervention provides an effective option for clinical care workers as a replacement for or supplement to the traditional care.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15825 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!