AI Article Synopsis

  • The study analyzed patient satisfaction and symptom control in German and Austrian patients with primary cervical dystonia (CD) receiving botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT-A) treatment, comparing their experiences to an international cohort.
  • Results showed that overall satisfaction with treatment was stable and high in both groups at maximum effect, but decreased as the effect wore off, with a noticeable drop in the DE/AT group.
  • The differences in patient satisfaction might stem from the varying proportions of BoNT-A naïve patients between the DE/AT subgroup and the overall cohort, as new patients typically reported different satisfaction levels compared to those who had previous treatments.

Article Abstract

Background: Even though treatment guidelines recommend botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT-A) as first line treatment for primary cervical dystonia (CD), there are only limited data on how BoNT-A-injections are administered in routine clinical practice.

Objective: This subgroup analysis evaluated patient satisfaction and symptom control under consideration of BoNT‑A treatment modalities in German and Austrian CD patients (DE/AT, n = 79) compared to the full international cohort (n = 995).

Material And Methods: The INTEREST-IN-CD2 was a prospective, multicenter, longitudinal observational study. Course of treatment in adult primary CD patients under BoNT‑A treatment was assessed over a time period of 3 years. Primary outcome measure was the long-term satisfaction of patients with treatment, measured as maximum satisfaction between two consecutive injections as well as satisfaction at the time of reinjection.

Results: Treatment satisfaction at the maximum effect was stable and comparably good in both populations during the study (82.3-92.7% and 85.0-89.9%). Satisfaction decreased with decreasing BoNT‑A effect at the end of the treatment interval: it was comparable at the start of the study in both groups (54.2% vs. 51.4%), decreased numerically in the DE/AT group to 32.7% but remained stable in the total population. Analysis of Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) and Tsui scores did not reveal any substantial differences between the DE/AT subgroup and total cohort.

Conclusion: Overall, the study confirmed good clinical symptom control by BoNT‑A. The numerical differences in the current satisfaction seen in the comparison of DE/AT to the total cohort are possibly due to different proportions of BoNT‑A naïve patients in both groups, as they expressed different levels of satisfaction than previously treated patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8648643PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00115-021-01120-1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bont‑a treatment
12
satisfaction patients
8
cervical dystonia
8
subgroup analysis
8
treatment
8
satisfaction
8
symptom control
8
patients
6
bont‑a
5
[treatment satisfaction
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!