A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Management of long ureteral stenosis: Alternatives to indwelling ureteral stents. | LitMetric

Management of long ureteral stenosis: Alternatives to indwelling ureteral stents.

Prog Urol

Department of Urology and Transplant surgery, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, AP-HP, University of Paris Descartes, Paris, France.

Published: September 2021

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study evaluates kidney autotransplantation (KAT) and ileal ureter substitution (IUS) as alternatives to ureteral stents for managing long ureteral stenosis (US).
  • The research was conducted on patients from 5 French university urology centers between 2010 and 2018, focusing on preserving kidney function without urinary diversion.
  • Results indicated that both KAT and IUS were effective, with a high preservation rate of ipsilateral kidneys and manageable postoperative complications, although surgical expertise played a crucial role in determining the appropriate treatment.

Article Abstract

Objectif: Evaluate kidney autotransplantation (KAT) and ileal ureter substitution (IUS) practice and outcome as alternatives to indwelling ureteral stents for the management of long ureteral stenosis (US).

Material: We included all patients treated for US with KAT or IUS in 5 French university urology centers between 2010 and 2018. We excluded US due to urothelial carcinoma. Primary endpoint was the preservation of ipsilateral kidney and renal function without any urinary diversion.

Results: 22 patients were treated with KAT (n=8, 36.4%) and IUS (n=14, 63.6%). Mean US length was 4.6cm and 6cm (P=0.52) in KAT and IUS groups respectively. US etiologies were lithiasis, iatrogenic, retroperitoneal fibrosis or extrinsic compression. US level was varied. The surgery was described as difficult because of peritoneal adhesions or major peri-ureteral fibrosis. Mean operating time and hospital stay were 336 and 346minutes (P=0.87) and 8 and 15 days respectively (P=0.001). Postoperative complications were mostly Clavien ≤2 (n=17, 77.3%). Revision surgery was required in the KAT group in 3 cases (37.5%), for textiles, renal vein thrombosis and anastomotic leak, none in the IUS group. The mean follow-up was 15.7 months. All but one (in the KAT group) ipsilateral kidneys were preserved, without renal function impairment (Δcreat +2.1 vs. +2.4μmol/l respectively, P=0.67), nor urinary diversion.

Conclusion: KAT and IUS are safe alternatives whose indication depends on surgeons expertise. Our study pointed out the scarcity of this practice suggesting the need to refer patients to expert centers.

Level Of Evidence: 3.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.purol.2020.10.004DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

kat ius
12
management long
8
long ureteral
8
ureteral stenosis
8
alternatives indwelling
8
indwelling ureteral
8
ureteral stents
8
patients treated
8
treated kat
8
renal function
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!