Background: The role of tumor mutational burden (TMB) is still debated for selecting advanced non-oncogene addicted non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who might benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Of note, TMB failed to predict a benefit in overall survival (OS) among such patients.

Materials And Methods: The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare efficacy outcomes among first-line immune-oncology (IO) agents versus standard platinum-based chemotherapy (CT) within two subgroups (TMB-low and TMB-high on either tissue or blood). We collected hazard ratios (HRs) to evaluate the association for progression-free survival (PFS) and OS, with the relative 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Risk ratios (RRs) were used as an association measure for objective response rate (ORR).

Results: Eight different cohorts of five randomized controlled phase III studies (3848 patients) were analyzed. In TMB-high patients, IO agents were associated with improved ORR (RRs 1.37, 95% CI 1.13-1.66), PFS (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.61-0.79) and OS (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.59-0.77) when compared with CT, thus suggesting a possible predictive role of high TMB for IO regimens. In TMB-low patients, the IO strategy did not lead to any significant benefit in survival and activity, whereas the pooled results of both ORR and PFS were intriguingly associated with a statistical significance in favor of CT.

Conclusions: This meta-analysis resulted in a proven benefit in OS in favor of IO agents in the TMB-high population. Although more prospective data are warranted, we postulated the hypothesis that monitoring TMB, in addition to the existing programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression level, could represent the preferable option for future clinical research in the first-line management of advanced non-oncogene addicted NSCLC patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8111593PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100124DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

advanced non-oncogene
12
non-oncogene addicted
12
tumor mutational
8
mutational burden
8
burden tmb
8
first-line management
8
management advanced
8
addicted non-small-cell
8
non-small-cell lung
8
lung cancer
8

Similar Publications

Pembrolizumab (an anti-PD1 antibody) alone or combined with chemotherapy represented the standard of care for advanced non-oncogene addicted non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. These therapies induced early modifications of the immune response impacting the clinical outcome. Identifying early changes in the immune system was critical to directing the therapeutic choice and improving the clinical outcome.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The upfront treatment of non-oncogene-addicted NSCLC relies on immunotherapy alone (ICI) or in combination with chemotherapy (CT-ICI). Genomic aberrations such as KRAS, TP53, KEAP1, SMARCA4, or STK11 may impact survival outcomes.

Methods: We performed an observational study of 145 patients treated with first-line IO or CT-ICI for advanced non-squamous (nsq) NSCLC at our institution tested with an extensive lab-developed NGS panel.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

: Single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitor (IO) therapy is the standard for non-oncogene-addicted advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) with PD-L1 tumor proportion score ≥ 50%. Smoking-induced harm generates high tumor mutation burden (H-TMB) in smoking patients (S-pts), while never-smoking patients (NS-pts) typically have low TMB (L-TMB) and are unresponsive to IO. However, the molecular characterization of NS-pts with H-TMB remains unclear.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based immunotherapy targeting programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) or its ligand 1 (PD-L1) has radically changed the management of many types of solid tumors including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Many clinical trials have demonstrated that ICIs improve the survival and the quality of life of patients with advanced non oncogene NSCLC as compared to standard therapies. However, not all patients achieve a clinical benefit from this immunotherapeutic approach.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) therapy with or without chemotherapy has been established as the first-line treatment for patients with non-oncogene addicted advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). Yet some clinical settings, such as the treatment sequence in patients with brain metastases, have barely been evidenced. Although ICIs cannot directly cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB), evidence suggests that BBB damage could allow ICIs into the central nervous system, or that they can have an indirect effect on the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) and cause an anti-tumor response.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!