The COVID-19 pandemic poses extraordinary public health challenges. In order to respond to such challenges, most democracies have relied on so-called 'evidence-based' policies, which supposedly devolve to science the burden of their justification. However, the biomedical sciences can only provide a theory-laden evidential basis, while reliable statistical data for policy support is often scarce. Therefore, scientific evidence alone cannot legitimise COVID-19 public health policies, which are ultimately based on political decisions. Given this inevitable input on policy-making, the risk of arbitrariness is ubiquitous and democratic scrutiny becomes essential to counter it. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the standards of scientific and democratic scrutiny have been, as a matter of fact, substantially lowered. This erosion potentially damages democracy.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8090916 | PMC |
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40656-021-00419-1 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Revolutionary breakthrough: FDA approves CASGEVY, the first CRISPR/Cas9 gene therapy for sickle cell disease.
Ann Med Surg (Lond)
August 2024
Department of research, Medical Research Circle, Goma, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a hereditary hemoglobinopathy resulting from a β-globin chain mutation that causes abnormal hemoglobin (HbS) polymerization and leads to severe complications. Current treatment options primarily focus on symptom management, with limited curative potential. Recently, Casgevy, the first CRISPR/Cas9-based gene therapy for SCD, has received breakthrough FDA approval.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFActualizing societal membership in imaginary interaction: The "real construction of society" in the opening of current affairs TV discussion.
Front Sociol
December 2023
Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
The wonder of modern mass-scale society has preoccupied sociological theorists for centuries. How does the whole live on and function? At the extreme of strong empirical traditions, conversation analysis focuses on studying the interactional organization of ongoing action and identities. My article puts these two inquiries together to explore the broader relevancies of situated talk and evidence the skillfulness of social actors in managing multi-scaled cultural memberships simultaneously.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFProcedural fairness in decision-making for financing a National Health Insurance Scheme: a case study from The Gambia.
Health Policy Plan
November 2023
Cluster for Global Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Sandakerveien 24C, Oslo 0473, Norway.
Achieving universal health coverage (UHC) involves difficult policy choices, and fair processes are critical for building legitimacy and trust. In 2021, The Gambia passed its National Health Insurance (NHI) Act. We explored decision-making processes shaping the financing of the NHI scheme (NHIS) with respect to procedural fairness criteria.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTransmission and territory: Urban bordering during COVID-19.
Polit Geogr
June 2023
School of Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, NSW, 2109, Australia.
The governance of COVID-19 has involved the proliferation of territorial practices, through border controls designed to regulate movements not only across national and state borders, but also within cities and city regions. We argue that these urban territorial practices have been significant to the biopolitics of COVID-19 and warrant close scrutiny. Focusing on the Australian cities of Sydney and Melbourne, this paper offers critical analysis of the urban territorial practices of COVID-19 suppression, which we categorise as practices of closure, confinement and capacity control.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFComplex systems of secrecy: the offshore networks of oligarchs.
PNAS Nexus
March 2023
Department of Mathematics, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA.
Following the invasion of Ukraine, the USA, UK, and EU governments-among others-sanctioned oligarchs close to Putin. This approach has come under scrutiny, as evidence has emerged of the oligarchs' successful evasion of these punishments. To address this problem, we analyze the role of an overlooked but highly influential group: the secretive professional intermediaries who create and administer the oligarchs' offshore financial empires.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!