Background: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is common in civilians and military personnel. No potential therapeutics have been evaluated to prevent secondary injury induced by the hypobaric hypoxia (HH) environment integral to postinjury aeromedical evacuation (AE). We examined the role of allopurinol, propranolol, adenosine/lidocaine/magnesium (ALM), or amitriptyline administration prior to simulated flight following murine TBI.
Methods: Mice underwent TBI and were given allopurinol, propranolol, amitriptyline, or ALM prior to simulated AE or normobaric normoxia (NN) control. Heart rate (HR), respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation (Spo2) were recorded throughout simulated AE. Mice were sacrificed at 24 hours, 7 days, or 30 days. Serum and cerebral cytokines were assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Motor function testing was performed with Rotarod ambulation. Immunohistochemistry was conducted to examine phosphorylated tau (p-tau) accumulation in the hippocampus at 30 days.
Results: While all treatments improved oxygen saturation, propranolol, amitriptyline, and allopurinol improved AE-induced tachycardia. At 24 hours, both propranolol and amitriptyline reduced tumor necrosis factor alpha levels while allopurinol and ALM reduced tumor necrosis factor alpha levels only in NN mice. Propranolol, amitriptyline, and ALM demonstrated lower serum monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 7 days after AE. Both amitriptyline and allopurinol improved Rotarod times for AE mice while only allopurinol improved Rotarod times for NN mice. Propranolol was able to reduce p-tau accumulation under both HH and NN conditions while ALM only reduced p-tau in hypobaric hypoxic conditions.
Conclusion: Propranolol lowered post-TBI HR with reduced proinflammatory effects, including p-tau reduction. Amitriptyline-induced lower post-TBI HR and improved functional outcomes without affecting inflammatory response. Allopurinol did not affect vital signs but improved late post-TBI systemic inflammation and functional outcomes. Adenosine/lidocaine/magnesium provided no short-term improvements but reduced p-tau accumulation at 30 days in the HH cohort. Allopurinol may be the best of the four treatments to help prevent short-term functional deficits while propranolol may address long-term effects.
Level Of Evidence: Basic science article.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000003259 | DOI Listing |
J Chromatogr Sci
January 2025
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, JSS College of Pharmacy, JSS Academy of Higher Education & Research, Mysuru 570 015, Karnataka, India.
The combination of the tricyclic antidepressant amitriptyline hydrochloride (AMH) and the non-selective beta-adrenergic blocker propranolol hydrochloride (PPH) is used for migraine prophylaxis. Higher doses of AMH trigger cardiac arrhythmias, anxiety, tachycardia, convulsions, hyperglycemia and anticholinergic side effects. The combined dosage formulation of AMH and PPH leads to drug-drug interactions; causes sedation, xerostomia, dysuria, insomnia and bradycardia; and results in patient non-compliance.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJAMA Netw Open
October 2024
The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Health Technol Assess
October 2024
Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Clin Toxicol (Phila)
September 2024
American College of Medical Toxicology, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Introduction: Tricyclic antidepressants often cause drug-induced QRS complex prolongation in overdose but are now less commonly prescribed. We sought to determine, among a contemporary cohort of patients, the pharmaceuticals independently associated with QRS complex prolongation in acute overdose.
Methods: We performed secondary analysis of data from the Toxicology Investigators Consortium (ToxIC) Core Registry.
Headache
October 2024
Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Objective: To develop machine learning models using patient and migraine features that can predict treatment responses to commonly used migraine preventive medications.
Background: Currently, there is no accurate way to predict response to migraine preventive medications, and the standard trial-and-error approach is inefficient.
Methods: In this cohort study, we analyzed data from the Mayo Clinic Headache database prospectively collected from 2001 to December 2023.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!