Purpose: In the reconstruction of volume breast images from x-ray projections in breast tomosynthesis, some tomographic systems truncate the image data presented to the radiologist such that a non-negligible amount of tissue may be missing from the breast image. QC tests were conducted to determine if this problem existed in imaging in the TMIST study.
Methods: Test tools developed for TMIST containing small objects at known heights were used in routine weekly and annual QC testing of tomosynthesis units to assess the degree to which phantom material that was irradiated in imaging was excluded from the reconstructed image. Results from 318 tests on five system types from three manufacturers are reported.
Results: The presence and extent of this problem varied among system types. The cause was most frequently related to machine errors in the determination of breast thickness or to deflection of components during breast compression. In particular, the problem occurred when a compression paddle other than the one calibrated for tomosynthesis was used for the tests. This was also verified to have occurred in some clinical imaging.
Conclusions: Missing volume can be avoided by intentionally reconstructing additional image slices above and below the presumed locations of the breast support and compression plate. A compression paddle which has been calibrated for tomosynthesis should be used both for clinical imaging and testing. The prevalence of this phenomenon suggests that more frequent testing for volume coverage may be advisable.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8513114 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.14911 | DOI Listing |
J Magn Reson Imaging
January 2025
Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Women with extremely dense breasts are at a higher risk of breast cancer, and the sensitivity of mammography in this group is reduced due to the masking effect of overlapping tissue. This review examines supplemental screening methods to improve detection in this population, with a focus on MRI. Morphologic techniques offer limited benefits, digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) shows inconsistent results, and ultrasound (US), while improving cancer detection rates (CDR), results in a higher rate of false positives.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPhys Med
January 2025
Medical Physics Unit, ASST Monza, Monza, Italy.
Purpose: Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) is an advanced mammography technique for which there are currently no internationally agreed methods and reference values for image quality assessment. The aim of this multicentre study was to evaluate a simple method to assess the technical image quality of reconstructed and synthetic 2D (SM) images of different models of DBT systems using commercially available phantoms.
Methods: The signal difference to noise ratio (SDNR) was chosen as an index of technical image quality and was evaluated for three commercial phantoms, Tomophan, Tormam and CIRS model 015, on 55 DBT systems (six vendors, nine models).
Phys Med
January 2025
National Co-ordinating Centre for the Physics of Mammography (NCCPM), Medical Physics Department, Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford GU2 7XX UK.
Background: The American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) Task group 282 (TG282) in collaboration with the European Federation for Organisations of Medical Physics (EFOMP) have developed a novel breast dosimetry model intended as a single international standard.
Purpose: To explore the impact of TG282 dosimetry on estimates of average Mean Glandular Dose (MGD) in the United Kingdom (UK) National Health Service (NHS) Breast Screening Programmes (BSP).
Methods: MGDs were estimated, using the TG282 dosimetry model, for the most recent UK NHSBSP dose survey.
J Med Imaging (Bellingham)
January 2025
Lund University, Department of Translational Medicine, Medical Radiation Physics, Malmö, Sweden.
Purpose: We aim to investigate the characteristics and evaluate the performance of synthetic mammograms (SMs) based on wide-angle digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) compared with digital mammography (DM).
Approach: Fifty cases with both synthetic and digital mammograms were selected from the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial. They were categorized into five groups consisting of normal cases and recalled cases with false-positive and true-positive findings from DM and DBT only.
AJR Am J Roentgenol
January 2025
Department of Radiology, Division of Breast Imaging and Intervention, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ.
Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) is growing in clinical use due to its increased sensitivity and specificity compared to full-field digital mammography (FFDM) and/or digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), particularly in patients with dense breasts. To perform an intraindividual comparison of MGD between FFDM, DBT, a combination protocol using both FFDM and DBT (combined FFDM-DBT), and CEM, in patients undergoing breast cancer screening. This retrospective study included 389 women (median age, 57.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!