A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

New Rehabilitation Concept for Maxillary Edentulism: A Clinical Retrospective Study of Implant Crown Retained Removable Partial Dentures. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • This study compared the effectiveness of implant-crown-retained removable partial dentures (IC-RPD) and implant overdentures (IOD) for maxillary edentulous patients, focusing on implant survival rates and marginal bone loss (MBL).
  • After observing 20 IC-RPDs and 18 IODs over a median of 47.1 months, IC-RPD showed a significantly higher implant survival rate at 97.3% compared to 70.4% for IOD.
  • Both treatments improved patient satisfaction in terms of function and aesthetics, but IOD resulted in more frequent prosthetic complications and higher MBL, especially in older patients and those with peri-implantitis.

Article Abstract

There have been no studies of implant-crown-retained removable partial dentures (IC-RPD) for the treatment of maxillary edentulism. The purpose of this study was to perform clinical and radiographic evaluations of implants in IC-RPD compared to implant overdentures (IOD) in maxillary edentulous patients. Twenty IC-RPDs with 74 splinted implant crowns and 18 IODs with 71 implants retained with magnet attachments were observed in 38 patients. We statistically analyzed survival rates and marginal bone loss (MBL) of implants based on multiple variables including first year pathologic condition, location of placed implant, age, and sex in both treatments. Patient reported oral measurements (PROMs) regarding functional/esthetic improvement after IC-RPD or IOD treatments and prosthetic complications were also statistically analyzed. After a median observation period of 47.1 months (up to 147 months), we observed 97.3% implant survival rates for IC-RPD and 70.4% for IOD ( < 0.001). Among variables, first year pathologic condition ( < 0.001) and sex ( = 0.027) influenced implant survival rates. The MBL of implants for IC-RPD and IOD groups at the final check-up were 1.12 ± 1.19 mm and 3.31 ± 1.71 mm, respectively ( < 0.001). In both groups, patients with peri-implantitis ( < 0.001) and patients older than 65 years ( = 0.029) showed significantly higher implant MBL regardless of treatment modality. Functional and esthetic satisfaction were significantly improved ( < 0.001) after both treatments. The IOD group showed more frequent prosthetic complications compared to the IC-RPD group. Within the limitations of a retrospective study, we concluded that RPD with few splinted implant crowns is a feasible alternative treatment modality for maxillary edentulous patients with anatomical limitations.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8073221PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10081773DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

survival rates
12
maxillary edentulism
8
retrospective study
8
implant
8
removable partial
8
partial dentures
8
implants ic-rpd
8
maxillary edentulous
8
edentulous patients
8
splinted implant
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!